User forums > General (but related to Code::Blocks)
smallB's suggestions
MortenMacFly:
--- Quote from: smallB on November 12, 2011, 12:23:07 pm ---You cannot have ambiguities there, can you?
--- End quote ---
Sure you can, why not? It can be seen as an abstraction of a class! In addition it gets more complex, as you need to really do a good and complete parsing before.
MortenMacFly:
--- Quote from: Alpha on November 12, 2011, 03:19:32 pm ---I have not looked very much into Code::Blocks' refactoring abilities; is it currently possible to refactor function/constructor/etc. arguments?
--- End quote ---
I don't know. We have some capabilities but I'll never use. I never trust any automisation when it comes to that kind of stuff... no matter what IDE. In the end you usually don't need it if you put software design before implementation.
smallB:
--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on November 12, 2011, 04:07:21 pm ---
--- Quote from: smallB on November 12, 2011, 12:23:07 pm ---You cannot have ambiguities there, can you?
--- End quote ---
Sure you can, why not? It can be seen as an abstraction of a class! In addition it gets more complex, as you need to really do a good and complete parsing before.
--- End quote ---
I somewhat cannot see how can you run into ambiguities here. Small code example would surely help ;)
ollydbg:
The code-refactoring feature in the currently CC is not good, I don't believe it will be good. Unless we have a compiler level parser.
smallB:
@ollydbg, thanks
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version