User forums > General (but related to Code::Blocks)
BerlisOS is Closing!
MortenMacFly:
--- Quote from: Dreamy on October 14, 2011, 10:11:31 am ---As if bazaar can't do that. :lol: Okey I stop, I see you're not really open-minded.
--- End quote ---
Look, the things is really simple: We are very used to SVN and have active branches. So switching now must be done with care. In addition, most core developers have strong experience with GIT. None of us has with bazaar. So why aren't we open-minded if we minimise risk? You should choose your words more carefully. :?
Jenna:
--- Quote from: Dreamy on October 14, 2011, 10:11:31 am ---As if bazaar can't do that. :lol: Okey I stop, I see you're not really open-minded.
--- End quote ---
Be careful what you right and stop getting personal, that's something I really don't like.
The only thing I said, that git can do that.
I know bazar can do that too, but I never used it.
I just started to work with git-svn on our subversion repo to test this feature.
I don't have the time to test bazar also (at the moment).
There are plenty of other things to do (family, work and other real lif stuff).
And the decision will be made by the developers and our project-leader, because we have to work with it the most time.
ollydbg:
--- Quote from: jens on October 14, 2011, 10:10:23 am ---But there is one feature of git, that looks really good to me, the local branching.
Working on patches, without the danger to interfere with others is a real cool feature.
--- End quote ---
I strongly suggest git. :D
Did you c::b developers decided which host will c::b migrate? There two months left. Besides the code database, I think some one(c::b developers) should achieve the bugs/features request, that's also very important database.
PS: After the migration, I'm considering to request for a developer of c::b. 8) Any chance??? or possibility???
Freem:
A (more or less) short post to correct my first one in this thread:
--- Quote from: Freem on October 03, 2011, 01:57:02 pm ---I hope it will help you to choose the right one. (my personal choice were gna.org, and it was simply easy to set-up trackers and versioning system. The problem is that there is only cvs and svn, as far as I know, and no wiki too... so I don't think you will choose it.)
--- End quote ---
gna.org seem to be moribund. Don't go there.
So I have searched for a better one, and I was stupid to choose gna.org, I should have taken http://savannah.nongnu.org/, which have more CVS support. (at least git, I'm not sure about mercurial or bazaar)
===
About branching, it seem this feature is common in DVCS.
If I understood everything correctly, it is simply done by the structure of decentralization, because each workdir is a working copy, and this is why CVS or SVN don't have it.
About svn 1.7.0, it seem they greatly enhanced performances, too.
oBFusCATed:
--- Quote from: Freem on October 14, 2011, 10:43:04 am ---If I understood everything correctly, it is simply done by the structure of decentralization, because each workdir is a working copy, and this is why CVS or SVN don't have it.
--- End quote ---
No, it is not because of DVCS, it is because they track changes, but CVS/SVN tracks files.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version