User forums > Help
2 questions: open #include and automatic indention
New++:
First things first: I just migrated from DevC++ and I have to say C::B really rocks.
But now to the questions:
1. The bug "[ 1338214 ] open include file does not always work" is closed, but the problem described still persists in my 1.0rc2. From the dates I would assume this fix should be part of 1.0rc2 already. Am I missing something here?
2. Is there a way to add automatic indention after the keywords public:, protected: and private:?
TIA
mandrav:
--- Quote from: New++ on December 02, 2005, 03:33:07 pm ---1. The bug "[ 1338214 ] open include file does not always work" is closed, but the problem described still persists in my 1.0rc2. From the dates I would assume this fix should be part of 1.0rc2 already. Am I missing something here?
--- End quote ---
That bug was about a specific missing search dir, IIRC.
Work has been done on this feature though (not yet in SVN) and is already improved...
--- Quote from: New++ on December 02, 2005, 03:33:07 pm ---2. Is there a way to add automatic indention after the keywords public:, protected: and private:?
--- End quote ---
No, there isn't...
rickg22:
Well, there's a workaround. Press TAB :lol:
Sorry, actually i'd have liked that feature, too, but so far nobody knows how to implement that.
Urxae:
--- Quote from: rickg22 on December 02, 2005, 04:10:09 pm ---Well, there's a workaround. Press TAB :lol:
Sorry, actually i'd have liked that feature, too, but so far nobody knows how to implement that.
--- End quote ---
Well, how was it implemented for auto-indent after "{"? Or is that one of those wxScintilla features that just had to be turned on?
mandrav:
--- Quote from: Urxae on December 02, 2005, 04:33:09 pm ---
--- Quote from: rickg22 on December 02, 2005, 04:10:09 pm ---Well, there's a workaround. Press TAB :lol:
Sorry, actually i'd have liked that feature, too, but so far nobody knows how to implement that.
--- End quote ---
Well, how was it implemented for auto-indent after "{"? Or is that one of those wxScintilla features that just had to be turned on?
--- End quote ---
No, it's not a scintilla feature.
But checking for the last character is quite different than checking for the last word, performance-wise.
And I didn't say it's not possible. New++ asked if this feature is implemented, and I just said no...
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version