User forums > Using Code::Blocks

Spell check dictionaries???

<< < (2/2)

oBFusCATed:

--- Quote from: BentFX on September 28, 2011, 09:08:32 am ---Nope! Just signed up for the releases. You've failed Emperor! I will not turn to the Dark Side. I am a Jedi! Like my father before me. :)

--- End quote ---
Jens is a bad man, is he packing the spellchecker with 10.05?  8)

BentFX:
@Jens...

--- Quote ---You can add any word to your personal dictionary manually:
--- End quote ---
Yes this all works fine. "Right-Click the flag", didn't know that. Works great.

What I was talking about is "exclusions." Lets say I use the en_US dictionary and it works well for me. But I prefer spelling humour, rather than humor. I can add humour to my personal dictionary, but I can't exclude humor(cause it to be marked as misspelled). An exclusion list allows you to 'remove' words from the dictionary.

And even now, C::B(en_US) is marking humour as misspelled, and Firefox(en_US) is marking humor as the bad word. Firefox(en_US) seems to have no problem with misspelt, but misspelt is misspelled no matter where you are. C::B(en_US) knows misspelt is bad!

I think spell checks are great. I just wish I was using the same one everywhere, and I could remove words as well as add them.

I'd like to see spell check as a system service, with additions, exclusions and intelligent autocorrect(macro expansion?) With intelligent autocorrect, cb could automatically correct to Code::Blocks.

Anyhow, spell check is great. I'm just not happy with it. :D

oBFusCATed:
BentFX: Keep in mind that there is a topic in the plugins sub-forum related to the SpellChecker. I suggest posting the Feature requests there.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page