User forums > Nightly builds
The 17 September 2011 build (7452) is out.
stefanos_:
People, something partially on-topic.
Will Code::Blocks going to use the new Subversion 1.7.0? Current projects need upgrade and that would break backward compatibility.
I haven't tried anything with Code::Blocks yet, just finished the upgrade procedure and I will try to test it myself.
Has anyone tried it already?
oBFusCATed:
--- Quote from: stefanos_ on October 20, 2011, 11:35:45 am ---Will Code::Blocks going to use the new Subversion 1.7.0? Current projects need upgrade and that would break backward compatibility.
--- End quote ---
What backwards compatibility?
Svn 1.7.x changes the disk format for the working copy, but this has nothing to do with the server hosting the repo.
stefanos_:
when I installed the latest tortoiseSVN I couldn't see any red exclamation mark for my Code::Blocks local repository, and I right-clicked on it and told me to upgrade it to the new SVN subversion but doing so would break the backwards compatibility.
Can you provide your feedback if you are under Windows oBFusCATed?
oBFusCATed:
Yes, you won't be able to use svn < 1.7, but so what, if you have to use svn 1.6.xx just make a new check out?
But what is the connection with the C::B project (us)?
p.s. Mostly linux, sometimes I run windows to play games or test new C::B features. At work I've migrated to linux, too.
ollydbg:
--- Quote from: coppolo on October 14, 2011, 12:09:31 pm ---I hope this is the right place for it... sorry if it is not.
Maybe it's a known issue (I could not find something like that in previous posts), but "Find declaration" and "Find implementation" does not work correctly with this code (you can try it in a new project):
--- Code: ---int foo()
{
return 0;
}
void bar(void)
{
foo(); // declaration and implementation are found correctly
switch(0)
{
case 0:
return foo(); // IT DOES NOT WORK while searching foo() declaration or implementation
}
}
--- End code ---
OS: Win Vista
--- End quote ---
I can confirm this, see the image below.
It looks like a cc's parser error on parsing the switch case statement.
I think it is not hard to fix this bug :D
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version