User forums > Help
code printout in Linux is poor
Ceniza:
--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on March 10, 2011, 08:49:41 pm ---While we are at it: I've a patch pending that completely updates the source exporter plugin to a recent wxPDFDoc. I didn't commit so far because of missing linux build support. Shall we do this together in a branch (e.g. wxSmith)?
--- End quote ---
A branch? Why? The trunk is sexier :D
If the whole idea is just to replace the pdf library with the most recent version, I could give it a try both in Winblows and Linux. Is there anything else in the patch other than just updating those files?
I think we should continue this discussion via PM, chat, e-mail or something alike. In case we continue hijacking this post, I will need to get a thief mask or something else that combines.
MortenMacFly:
--- Quote from: Ceniza on March 11, 2011, 06:08:29 pm ---A branch? Why? The trunk is sexier :D
--- End quote ---
Because a commit would ultimately break compilation of trunk under Linux. I don't want tat.
And yes: It's basically a major update of wxPDF.
Ceniza:
--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on March 11, 2011, 08:31:00 pm ---Because a commit would ultimately break compilation of trunk under Linux. I don't want tat.
--- End quote ---
My idea was to ensure that it compiles and works both in Winblows and Linux, so committing to trunk would not be a problem as long as I achieve that, right?
MortenMacFly:
--- Quote from: Ceniza on March 11, 2011, 09:47:35 pm ---so committing to trunk would not be a problem as long as I achieve that, right?
--- End quote ---
OK - go ahead! Automake and unix project files need an update now. BTW: I had to patch wxPDFDoc to work properly as DLL. I'll comment/document that later.
Check the C::B project files for needed compiler flags (#define's).
Ceniza:
I see that you have committed to trunk already, so I will check in Linux soon.
[edit]
I have been checking on Windows so far, and the project is building extra programs that we do not need. I also see that wxPDFDocument is now built as a DLL instead of being statically linked. Do we really want that?
[/edit]
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version