User forums > General (but related to Code::Blocks)

Code Libraries

<< < (2/2)

awsdert:
Fair enough, however I was talking about compiler independent Libraries for 32bit platforms, at least then the developer could simply replace the 32bit versions with 64bit versions should he need to. Furthermore 1s that are specific to OS would not be included on the list.

oBFusCATed:
No way this could happen.
You have to learn to build the libs you need or switch to linux.
There you'll have a package manager and 99% of the libs will be installed/managed automatically.

awsdert:
I already can, it's just a pain to do manually. Maybe I'll start a Project on Google Code later for platform specific installers.

MortenMacFly:
Remember that there is general support for the most common libs through DevPaks on Windows.

stahta01:

--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on February 24, 2011, 05:49:14 pm ---Remember that there is general support for the most common libs through DevPaks on Windows.

--- End quote ---

@awsdert: If you Compiler is supported by DevPaks, I suggest trying to use DevPaks and work on ways to improve it under Code::Blocks.
If not, I suggest working on ways to add Libraries to the Compiler you wish to support.

Note: Most/All C++ Binary Libraries are Compiler dependent. Some C++ Binary Libraries only work with a limited version of one Compiler.
If you truly wish to support multiple Compilers, you are likely going to be able to only use C Binary Libraries and Libraries that are header files only.
(or Source code only support of Libraries.)

Tim S.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page