Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Development

Move repository to subversion?

<< < (2/5) > >>

takeshimiya:
UPDATE: As a developer you can submit your project to be in the list of beta testing of SourceForge SVN.

For that you must fill a Feature Request like this.

mandrav:

--- Quote ---I don't have problems if you're going to move *only* the repository to BerliOS SVN, but not the entire site.
--- End quote ---

Yes, I 'm talking about the repository. The site isn't on sourceforge anyway...


--- Quote ---SVN support in sf.net is in testing stage
--- End quote ---


--- Quote from: SF.NET UPDATE 2005-10-31 ---Our progress on CVS performance and reliability has freed up resources
to begin planning deployment of a long-awaited Subversion offering.
--- End quote ---

They want to "begin planning" subversion support... They 're in this "begin planning" stage for over a year...


--- Quote ---As a developer you can submit your project to be in the list of beta testing of SourceForge SVN.
--- End quote ---

I have, but I don't hold my breath ;)

kisoft:

--- Quote from: mandrav on November 18, 2005, 08:52:48 am ---...
They want to "begin planning" subversion support... They 're in this "begin planning" stage for over a year...
...

--- End quote ---

Bad :(

My hot head said SVN!
My cold mind said CVS.

I vote to SVN, I love it more.

Der Meister:
I also would prefer SVN on Berlios - not only because it's SVN but Berlios seems to have much less performance problems than sf.net...

MortenMacFly:
I would generally agree. Recently I had the same thoughts at work where I (with a small group of other developers) use CVS. Subversion is really promising and already stable. Also converting CVS to Subversion worked from scratch with the tools provided by tigris.org (at least for me).

But: In the end we did not switch because of the lack of GUI's for Subversion. A lot are being developed but besides Tortoise in my opinion none is ready-to-use. For us, Tortoise was no option because of the Explorer integration - we clearly prefer a stand-alone program. I don't know, if this is important for Code::Blocks, I just thought it might be helpful to share that experience.

Morten.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page