Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Development
SVN-HEAD binaries download
duncanka:
--- Quote from: therion on December 05, 2005, 05:08:19 pm ---
--- Quote from: Revy on December 05, 2005, 02:41:19 pm ---would you be so kind and add SHFolder(before Shell32) to the link libraries of the sdk target for your builds - then Codeblocks could be used on W98 again.
--- End quote ---
Hello Revy
I have just recompiled CB with this lib, unfortunatelly, i dont have 98, can you test it pls?
I ll upload (rev1450) in a couple of minutes.
Thx
--- End quote ---
It works again on Windows 98SE!! Hooray!!! :D :D :D
Revy:
Hi Therion,
it works perfectly, many thanks to you Therion! :D
--- Quote from: therion on December 05, 2005, 05:08:19 pm ---
--- Quote from: Revy on December 05, 2005, 02:41:19 pm ---would you be so kind and add SHFolder(before Shell32) to the link libraries of the sdk target for your builds - then Codeblocks could be used on W98 again.
--- End quote ---
Hello Revy
I have just recompiled CB with this lib, unfortunatelly, i dont have 98, can you test it pls?
I ll upload (rev1450) in a couple of minutes.
Thx
--- End quote ---
Revy:
It looks like we were a bit too fast, it does start on w98 now, but you can't build any projects because someone hardcoded the shell command: :(
Execution of 'cmd /c mingw32-g++.exe -IC:\MinGW\include -c E:\Progr\CBT\Console\main.cpp -o .objs\main.o' in 'E:\Progr\CBT\Console' failed.
The option in the window where you are supposed to change this is disabled :/
Anyways thank you very much for your effort therion.
I guess I will just have to upgrade to W2k/XP and use MS Visual C++ again.
I'm a bit sad atm, because Code::Blocks is meant to be a portable IDE and can't even run on different Win32 platforms.
And the worst is, I'm absolutly sure the usage of W98 is higher than the usage of Linux.
Bye
A sad Revy
mandrav:
--- Quote from: Revy on December 06, 2005, 10:30:01 am ---I guess I will just have to upgrade to W2k/XP and use MS Visual C++ again.
I'm a bit sad atm, because Code::Blocks is meant to be a portable IDE and can't even run on different Win32 platforms.
And the worst is, I'm absolutly sure the usage of W98 is higher than the usage of Linux.
Bye
A sad Revy
--- End quote ---
--- Quote from: C::B sources ---
--- Code: --- // TODO (mandrav#1#): Check windows version and substitute cmd.exe with command.com if needed.
cmd->command = _T("cmd /c ") + cmd->command;
--- End code ---
--- End quote ---
Revvy, you 're free to go whichever way you want but judging a program while it is still being developed is plain wrong.
You want to use the SVN-HEAD version. That's just fine. But if things don't work for you as expected (yet), you shouldn't complain about it. We 're working hard on this project and trying to make everybody happy. But things need to be coded to work. Code doesn't just write itself. So if I haven't had the time yet to fix this, it doesn't mean I never will.
If you want this to work now, provide a patch.
I don't work for you, nor any of the other developers. We do this on our free time and you have to respect it. If you don't like C::B, you 're free not to use it. But you don't have the right to demand from anyone here to work on your schedule.
You see Revvy, open source doesn't mean "free workers at your disposal". You got things all wrong...
David Perfors:
It shouldn't be that hard to change it, if there is a possibility to find which command to use (command or cmd) then it is very easy.. I will try to fix this tonight ;) (does this make youhappy again Revy :))
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version