User forums > Embedded development
Project Template For AVR GCC Compiler
oBFusCATed:
I'm not embedded programmer, but if you two collaborate and produce a patch
to the template you both agree on, I can commit it. The patch will be reverted if
there is a user complaining and you don't provide him with support, of course.
In the screen shot I see removed check boxes, are they really useless?
kenzanin:
--- Quote from: scarphin on October 25, 2011, 10:08:16 am ---I also added options for programmer and debugger but no one was interested in. And CB doesn't get updated with templates.
--- End quote ---
i guest that not true, iam here because i never knew someone has already make modification, otherwise i will used it rather than goggling(to much) and for hours reading codeblock wiki about wizard scripting. and i believe there many user will agree that CB default wizard for AVR is to simple for their need.
sorry if iam mistake.
--- Quote from: oBFusCATed on October 25, 2011, 10:31:08 am ---In the screen shot I see removed check boxes, are they really useless?
--- End quote ---
i make that modification based on what i need most, i believe someone feel that check box is necessary otherwise it wont be there
this what iam remove form the check box and the reason
->create hex file
i remove the check box and make that default, because AVR simulator that i use VMLab, only support for hex and coff. as far as i knew
->run avr-size after build
i remove the check box and make that default, i guest i never meet someone that never care about the code size.
scarphin:
Providing a patch won't be a problem as I've provided every patch i made. But it should be the users who will decide if a patch is ok or need enhancing and I don't know how it will be possible if they are not even committed? Anyway I'll try it again. ;)
oBFusCATed: Check boxes are not useless and have to be made optional imo.
kenzanin: U can browse the history of my patches and enhancements to the template on this thread.
oBFusCATed:
--- Quote from: scarphin on October 25, 2011, 11:28:14 am ---oBFusCATed: Check boxes are not useless and have to be made optional imo.
--- End quote ---
I've not said it is useless, I've asked why it is removed.
kenzanin: Keep in mind that all the different systems/boards have very different requirements, thus the argument I don't need it, so I'll remove it is invalid.
separate suggestion:
Have thought of making default profiles for different systems?
A combobox with the most common ones?
Maybe you need different wizard templates?
If you agree on something I have no problem with committing it, as I've already said...
kenzanin:
--- Quote from: scarphin on October 25, 2011, 11:28:14 am ---kenzanin: U can browse the history of my patches and enhancements to the template on this thread.
--- End quote ---
ok thanks you
oBFusCATed: i think different wizard is the most easy option :D. and i agree with combo box with most common one but i still prefer using hex rather than bin. thanks you
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version