User forums > Nightly builds
The 19 september 2010 build (6608) CODECOMPLETION BRANCH version is out.
Loaden:
--- Quote from: thomas on September 27, 2010, 05:09:24 pm ---Not sure if we really need this. We've had a nullptr implementation since 2007 (I wrote that one before being aware of Meyer's more elegant solution), and nobody ever cared to use nullptr anywhere in the code :P
--- End quote ---
This seems more like we do not know there is a nullptr implement in CB's sdk.
Use nullptr instead of 0 (or NULL) is sooner or later.
I like the C++0x. :)
Loaden:
--- Quote from: blueshake on September 27, 2010, 02:21:47 pm ---
--- Quote from: blueshake on September 22, 2010, 04:59:56 pm ---support member variable initialation codecompletion now
--- End quote ---
nice to visit the forum again.
here is the patch.
--- End quote ---
Nice! The patch improved code completion in member variable init position.
Now it will works better.
huliming2004:
a.h
namespace A{
class myclass{
public:
void myfunc();
}
}
a.cpp
using namespace A;
void myclass::myfunc(){
//codes here
}
where i right clicked "void myfunc()" in file "a.h" and choose "find implemetion of myfunc()", but failed with "not found myfunc()"
i know it's because of namespace, if i add namespace like this: A::myclass::myfunc(), it's fine
Loaden:
--- Quote from: huliming2004 on October 01, 2010, 11:59:14 pm ---a.h
namespace A{
class myclass{
public:
void myfunc();
}
}
a.cpp
using namespace A;
void myclass::myfunc(){
//codes here
}
where i right clicked "void myfunc()" in file "a.h" and choose "find implemetion of myfunc()", but failed with "not found myfunc()"
i know it's because of namespace, if i add namespace like this: A::myclass::myfunc(), it's fine
--- End quote ---
confirmed!
And this code could be parse well.
a.cpp
namespace A
{
void myclass::myfunc(){
//codes here
}
}
ollydbg:
--- Quote from: Loaden on October 02, 2010, 03:11:58 am ---a.cpp
namespace A
{
void myclass::myfunc(){
//codes here
}
}
--- End quote ---
Yes, I prefer using this way, and CC works fine.
and Currently CC does not handling "using namespace XXX " directive correctly.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version