User forums > Announcements
Code::Blocks 10.05 has arrived
thomas:
--- Quote from: pjoseph on January 12, 2011, 06:31:21 am ---I want to let you know that I was unable to download the debian 64-bit from sourceforge. I was expecting an 18.8M file but only get a 3.3M corrupted file.
--- End quote ---
Thank you for pointing this out. I have re-uploaded that file, which should hopefully be complete now.
Unluckily, the upload mechanism at SF is not very reliable. I have 1Gbps upstream bandwidth and get between 50 and 100 kB per second on SF, about half of my uploads time out or fail otherwise. And, you never know if the server discards or keeps a partial file that failed. Common sense would tell you that if an upload failed, the server should always discard the file, but oh well. It's not what seems to happen.
vodoomoth:
Hi all,
my question is specifically for the developers and the people who really make the project live, decide things or have their say in them: is there a reason why releases are so far in between?
Please, don't take it as a criticism, I just mean that I am puzzled by the release schedule (or apparent lack thereof). All the more since I built a trunk version and had a notification that some (I guess third-party) plugins like wxSmith or cccc are not loaded because of a version problem.
This is more of a question than whining so please don't go all out on me. Thanks.
oBFusCATed:
The not loading error happens, when a plugin is build with different version of the SDK, than the one C::B is using.
To fix this problem rebuild all contrib pluigns (using the appropriate workspace file).
Also if you're on windows you can use the Nightly builds.
patheticcockroach:
--- Quote from: vodoomoth on March 06, 2011, 04:04:52 pm ---is there a reason why releases are so far in between?
--- End quote ---
Hi,
I do have the same question. On a personal level I really don't mind using the regularly released nightlies (I just switched to the April's one, actually ;)), but I know some people whom I just can't convince to switch or stick to Code::Blocks just because they "have those issues with the latest stable and [they] don't want to hear about installing something called nightly". So I believe this would be good for the project to release "stable" versions more often, even if those are just glorified nightlies (which are better than the 10.05 stable anyway). Well, just my 2 cents, as I said I'm happy with the monthly nightly for myself ;)
Dreamy:
I think many of us, including me, agree with patheticcockroach. Releasing the "glorified nightlies" more often would definitely make Code::Blocks more popular.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version