User forums > Announcements
Code::Blocks 10.05 has arrived
oBFusCATed:
--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on June 07, 2010, 09:57:21 pm ---What about:
http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/codeblocks-10.05-0.fc13.src.rpm
--- End quote ---
this is not listed here: http://www.codeblocks.org/downloads/25
--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on June 07, 2010, 09:57:21 pm ---http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/codeblocks-10.05-1debian-src.tar.bz2
???
--- End quote ---
OK, here is the original complain:
--- Quote ---(2010-06-07 16:38:55) Aldaron: Anyway, I was mutilating the slackware build script for the new version. And EVERYTHING was changed after the last version..
(2010-06-07 16:41:13) Aldaron: Details: it makes no sense that the only source release version is "10.05-1debian". That's ugly, also it doesn't even uncompress to a dir with the same version, but to a dir called "src/". Inside is another source package with another version, which uncompresses to a dir with a third version tag.
(2010-06-07 16:43:47) Aldaron: Additionally, gz -> bz2, except the inner package.
(2010-06-07 16:44:24) Aldaron: I already forgot if there was something else, but making a script to automatically build and package the software is right now as hard as it gets
(2010-06-07 16:44:54) Aldaron: except for the fact that Code::Blocks itself compiles nicely, but that's because the code is good quality
(2010-06-07 16:46:28) Aldaron: so, please put some sensible version tag to the zip file and have it decompress to a dir with the *same* version (and software name), and it's much easier for everyone
(2010-06-07 20:02:26) obfuscated: Aldaron: if you have the svn tree checked out, you can do make dist and you'll have a source tarball
(2010-06-07 20:12:54) Aldaron: obfuscated: yea, I did find that out.
(2010-06-07 20:13:44) Aldaron: but I don't think it makes sense to make all users of all non-debian distros to do that
(2010-06-07 20:15:03) Aldaron: right now it seems that source only works for debian (okay, it's not debian-specific, but it kinda claims to be)
--- End quote ---
The gentoo people might have the same complain...
Jenna:
I hope I find the time to create a clean (non-debian and without the docs I added for debian) source tar-ball tomorrow.
If I have uploaded it to berlios I post it here.
eweb2009:
Ubuntu 10.04
first of all, very appreciate your efforts in improving this IDE for us.
codeblocks 8.02 puts compiler settings under build option, that is a convenient way as compiler's debug/release mode can be set up directly under build option. but in version 10.05 compiler settings is moved to "global" settings. Because compiler settings for debug/release mode are different, we have to go into "settings" to select options for compiler, and go into "build option" to set up other options. could you please let me know if this can be modified by users or not? or let me know the advantages of such change?
thank you.
Jenna:
--- Quote from: eweb2009 on June 08, 2010, 05:38:55 am ---Ubuntu 10.04
first of all, very appreciate your efforts in improving this IDE for us.
codeblocks 8.02 puts compiler settings under build option, that is a convenient way as compiler's debug/release mode can be set up directly under build option. but in version 10.05 compiler settings is moved to "global" settings.
--- End quote ---
No such changes between 8.02 and 10.05, the only exception might be for projects with custom makefiles (I don't remember exactly how it was in 8.02).
But in these cases the compiler settings are totally ignored, because the makefile does it and C::B does not know anything about it.
Jenna:
--- Quote from: jens on June 07, 2010, 11:13:03 pm ---I hope I find the time to create a clean (non-debian and without the docs I added for debian) source tar-ball tomorrow.
If I have uploaded it to berlios I post it here.
--- End quote ---
Here it is:
http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/codeblocks-10.05-src.tar.bz2
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version