User forums > General (but related to Code::Blocks)

codeblocks/mingw/python and more

<< < (4/7) > >>

MortenMacFly:

--- Quote from: reckless on May 22, 2010, 05:21:02 pm ---morten could you try testing this one ?

--- End quote ---
Sorry, but I don't run self-compiled software from unknown source. :)

reckless:
 :lol: well its codeblocks :)

just wanted to know if you see any adverse effects of linking it this way :)

newer gcc has a nasty habit of linking in libgcc and libstdc++ anywhere and everywhere so i looked for a way to possibly cut down on having multiple dlls of the same type on my system :)

so i linked it with -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ -exclude-libs=libgcc_eh.a

ofc with standard mingw you still need mingwm10.dll

not sure if it affects debugging it so i had to ask ;)

reckless:
ftp is down atm due to hardware failure (gfx card died) had to reinstall win 7 after and not quite done getting my environment setup.

ill post when its up again.

meanwhile most of the stuff can be downloaded from google code site.

reckless:
its come to my attention that theres concern about the validity of some of the tools in this package investigating it atm dont want to bring any trouble to the codeblocks team.

link will be taken down temporarily untill im sure all tools are in public domain.

sorry for the inconvinience.

reckless:
ok been over the different tools and so far it seems legit (only tools im not certain of yet are some of the codec libraries) namely opencore_amr_nb and wb xvid and speex.

python ruby and the other script language compilers so far seems to adhere to the gpl license. (pretty much the same toolset as cygwin but win32 versions).

my guess is if cygwin can use em it should be fine.

if the codeblocks team prefer's me to host the links elsewhere i will ablige though.

if i start hosting it again and any license holder finds something out of order i will offcourse remove said package.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page