Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Development

wxCHECK_VERSION vs wxVERSION_NUMBER

(1/2) > >>

lonesock:
Hi, All.

I've been using Code::Blocks for a while now and am extremely impressed...thanks.  So I started using the CVS version to keep up to date, but I'm still using wx version 2.4.2.  A few days ago I had something break in sdk\cbthreadpool.cpp.  The offending section was:

#if wxCHECK_VERSION(2,6,0)
    wxMilliSleep(1);
#else
    wxUSleep(1);
#endif

when I checked through the code I found something similar and used this instead:

#if wxVERSION_NUMBER < 2500
   wxUsleep(1);
#else
   wxMilliSleep(1);
#endif

and now it works just great.  I keep checking the CVS version, but it hasn't been changed as of now, so I thought I'd mention it.

Great work, everybody.

Jonathan

[edit] using MinGW 3.2.3 & 3.4 on Win2K and XP (and I have it working on Ubuntu! but haven't updated it in a while) [/edit]

thomas:
Updated in cvs. Thanks for pointing out.

mandrav:
But the problem wasn't with wxCHECK_VERSION, but rather with wxUSleep and it was fixed (i.e. changed to wxUsleep) a few hours later.
 :shock:

thomas:
Lonesock was right, though. I did a fresh checkout of HEAD and indeed, it still had wxUSleep.

Funnily, my commit does not show in viewcvs, either. If you check out, you get the correct version, though.
Does viewcvs have a delay of a couple of hours, maybe?

mandrav:

--- Quote from: thomas on October 27, 2005, 09:54:51 am ---Funnily, my commit does not show in viewcvs, either. If you check out, you get the correct version, though.
Does viewcvs have a delay of a couple of hours, maybe?

--- End quote ---

Viewcvs uses anonymous cvs to access the repository, so it bears the anon-cvs lag (4-6 hours)...

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page