Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > CodeCompletion redesign
CC's new bug, SVN6049, XPSP3
Loaden:
--- Quote from: blueshake on January 06, 2010, 03:43:30 am ---@Loaden
maybe the error come from this.
see the attachment.
--- End quote ---
Thanks! Do you mean let me add a few more conversions?
However, I added in the process encountered a problem, as shown.
[attachment deleted by admin]
ollydbg:
--- Quote from: Loaden on January 06, 2010, 03:52:22 am ---
--- Quote from: blueshake on January 06, 2010, 03:43:30 am ---@Loaden
maybe the error come from this.
see the attachment.
--- End quote ---
Thanks! Do you mean let me add a few more conversions?
However, I added in the process encountered a problem, as shown.
--- End quote ---
Ok, you should manually change the "default.conf" file.
By the way, I think we should remove this kind of check when adding new macro replacement rules. right?
blueshake:
if I remember right.the configuration file is in somewhere of c:(search it if you using windows.)
Loaden:
--- Quote from: ollydbg on January 06, 2010, 03:54:42 am ---
--- Quote from: Loaden on January 06, 2010, 03:52:22 am ---
--- Quote from: blueshake on January 06, 2010, 03:43:30 am ---@Loaden
maybe the error come from this.
see the attachment.
--- End quote ---
Thanks! Do you mean let me add a few more conversions?
However, I added in the process encountered a problem, as shown.
--- End quote ---
Ok, you should manually change the "default.conf" file.
By the way, I think we should remove this kind of check when adding new macro replacement rules. right?
--- End quote ---
Nice! When I was in default.conf where to add these rules, CC has been work well now.
Thank you very much! !
Loaden:
--- Quote from: blueshake on January 06, 2010, 03:58:14 am ---if I remember right.the configuration file is in somewhere of c:(search it if you using windows.)
--- End quote ---
Yes. I am using SVN5731 configuration. I just tried it, when the default.conf does not exist, the default is generated, there will be six replacement rule, not the old versions of one replacement rule.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version