User forums > Nightly builds
The 02 January 2010 build (6023) is out.
Wavesonics:
The "Lets please have a new Stable release" debate is a sensitive topic on here, treed softly :P
Loaden:
--- Quote from: jens on January 04, 2010, 02:16:26 pm ---
--- Quote from: Loaden on January 04, 2010, 01:24:46 pm ---The button to see the status unclear, it is recommended to use gray icon represents is not enabled, while the colored icons on behalf of the opening.
Thanks!
--- End quote ---
Disabled buttons are in fact greyed out.
What you mean (I think) is the difference between toggled (active option) and untoggled (inactive option) button.
On XP there is not much difference between the two states, on linux it's much better.
I will look into it.
--- Quote from: Loaden on January 04, 2010, 01:24:46 pm ---Also, why the path does not support global variables? For example: $ (WX.include) or $ (WX)
--- End quote ---
Because it's not (yet) implemented.
I will see how easy this can be done.
Thanks for the suggestion.
--- End quote ---
SVN 6077, This version still does not work properly. From the search results view, ThreadSearch did not receive $ (WX) the correct path.
[attachment deleted by admin]
Loaden:
This API can not be resolved, do not know whether the information will help CC the bug fixes?
--- Code: ---#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <windows.h>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
Wai
string s;
return 0;
}
--- End code ---
[attachment deleted by admin]
Loaden:
With make_pair, seems CC can not resolve it correctly.
[attachment deleted by admin]
Jenna:
--- Quote from: Loaden on January 12, 2010, 04:02:26 pm ---
--- Quote from: jens on January 04, 2010, 02:16:26 pm ---
--- Quote from: Loaden on January 04, 2010, 01:24:46 pm ---The button to see the status unclear, it is recommended to use gray icon represents is not enabled, while the colored icons on behalf of the opening.
Thanks!
--- End quote ---
Disabled buttons are in fact greyed out.
What you mean (I think) is the difference between toggled (active option) and untoggled (inactive option) button.
On XP there is not much difference between the two states, on linux it's much better.
I will look into it.
--- Quote from: Loaden on January 04, 2010, 01:24:46 pm ---Also, why the path does not support global variables? For example: $ (WX.include) or $ (WX)
--- End quote ---
Because it's not (yet) implemented.
I will see how easy this can be done.
Thanks for the suggestion.
--- End quote ---
SVN 6077, This version still does not work properly. From the search results view, ThreadSearch did not receive $ (WX) the correct path.
--- End quote ---
Try $(#wx) !
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version