Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Plugins development

(Minor) improvement of CodeCompletion?

<< < (3/5) > >>

takeshimiya:
CodeCompletion needs a full real C++ parser. :)

anonuser:
Is C-Tags used?

rickg22:
no, it doesn't.  All the parsing is hardwired. Frankly i'd vote to use an alternative engine, and use only the integrated parser only c++ projects.

Also, i understand that the Code::Bocks parser has to be "fault tolerant", but is this really necessary? I mean, if the code doesn't appear in the class browser, it means it won't compile anyway, so that "minus" would be really a "plus". What do you think guys?

(note: Of course this wouldn't change before 1.0 is released)

anonuser:
Wouldn't it make sense to use exctags tp generate tag files and use their library which is public domain if I remember correctly. It handles all sorts of things. In fact I believe it'll even give you class::member if you generate with extra stuff in it.

MortenMacFly:

--- Quote from: anonuser on November 17, 2005, 01:33:46 am ---Does the Codecompletion plugin take scope into consideration?

--- End quote ---
Yes, it does if you enable it (or better: do not disable "SmartSense").

Morten.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page