Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Development

Possible BrowseTracker Problem

(1/3) > >>

rhf:
Hi guys,
I am having problems with SVN 5944 on Windows XP.
When I have an editor window open, the program continues to run even if nothing is going on.
Windows Task Manager shows codeblocks using essentially all cpu time ~95-97%.
The problem goes away when I disable BrowseTracker.
When I re-enable BrowseTracker, however, the problem returns.
I notice there were some recent changes to BrowseTracker and expect that something is not quite right.

Edit: Apparently this is same problem as mentioned in
http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,10813.msg78796.html#msg78796.

In http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,10813.msg78897.html#msg78897
Pecan says BrowseTracker is fixed in svn 5944. Unfortunately, it is not fixed for me. In svn 5944 log, Pecan mentions fix of OnIdle() loop in svn 5939; so I reverted back past that point to svn 5935 and everything seems OK.

Pecan:
I cannot reproduce this with svn 5944. I'm getting 98% cpu idle on XP sp2 with any number of editors open.

Look at menu plusgins/Manage plugins. What's the version of BrowseTracker?

Can you till me the steps to cause the loop?

rhf:

--- Quote from: Pecan on November 30, 2009, 11:35:07 pm ---Look at menu plusgins/Manage plugins. What's the version of BrowseTracerk?
Can you till me the steps to cause the loop?

--- End quote ---
I reverted back to svn 5935. The BrowseTracker version for this is 1.2.85 2009/11/9.
I am not sure of the BrowseTracker Version that was giving me troubles. It happened for sure at svn 5944.
I think it also happened for svn 5943 but am not positive about this.
To cause the problem, I would open a project (I experimented with several different projects), open one or more files with the editor, do a build. The codeblocks.exe cpu would bounce to about 95 and stay very high until I killed the program or clicked a toolbar icon.
If you like, I can download svn 5942, or any other version you might suggest, and see if I have the problem then.

ollydbg:
@rhf
I just test the new rev 5944. (TDM-GCC 4.4.1-2), it works quite well.
I can't reproduce the problem mentioned by you. :D

rhf:
@Pecan and ollydbg
Thanks for your responses. Since neither of you had this problem, I did a complete new checkout (svn 5944) and installation, and everything is now working normally. I have no idea what the problem was, and I apologize for the noise.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page