Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > CodeCompletion redesign

CodeCompletion in Codelite is very powerful.

<< < (2/2)

blueshake:

--- Quote from: eranif on October 29, 2009, 05:30:37 am ---
--- Quote from: blueshake on October 29, 2009, 01:05:36 am ---But it seems that codelite can not parse template and do macro replacement too.

--- End quote ---
You are partially correct about the macro replacement, codelite has a limited capability in this area (similar to codeblocks I believe, it can only perform simple replacements of macros, but it can NOT evaluate if a macro is defined or not)

However, regarding the template, well you are wrong here. codelite can handle templates up to a certain degree.
I dont use templates much, since I think that templates are evil. But codelite *can* handle them (at least it can handle the ones I have wrote).

For example, codelite can not handle the STL templates, but it can handle the boost templates pretty well, plus some support for operator overloading (especially -> operator), for example:


Eran

--- End quote ---


Seem powerful than codeblock's codecompletion.

blueshake:

--- Quote from: mmkider on October 29, 2009, 04:14:22 am ---
--- Quote from: henrya2 on October 28, 2009, 04:30:56 pm ---CodeCompletion in Codelite is very powerful. It is just like Visual C++ 6 plus VisualAssitX.

Hope its feature can be ported to Code::Blocks.

--- End quote ---


I think function name can be rendered  color in the codelite.
But In the codeblocks, it's not.

--- End quote ---


I want the function name can be rendered color too.Just don't know how to implement this.
for example.
I define a funciton "abc" and not save the file.So the parser didn't know this(abc) is a function name until I save the file.It seems that the parser must have the ability to parse the file in a real time(once I add any chars to the file, it (parser) must reparse the file).

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page