Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Development

Improvement in TabSwitcher

<< < (7/10) > >>

Feneck91:
Trying to apply this patch now... very complex to apply because a lot of conflits.
Alatar, this patch will be integrated by code::blocks teams or not ?

Alatar:
I don`t know... This is question for Morten.
I can try to generate new patch and update it in tracker, but this will take some time - my working copy now has more fixes =).

MortenMacFly:

--- Quote from: Feneck91 on March 06, 2010, 07:38:27 pm ---Alatar, this patch will be integrated by code::blocks teams or not ?

--- End quote ---

--- Quote from: Alatar on March 07, 2010, 08:33:01 am ---I don`t know... This is question for Morten.

--- End quote ---
I would have no objections. However, this patch is still untested under Linux, that's why I didn't apply it so far. However, I am working with it under Windows on everyday basis - no issues.


--- Quote from: Alatar on March 07, 2010, 08:33:01 am ---my working copy now has more fixes =).

--- End quote ---
Which in particular? Meaning: Are they related to the tabswitch? This would put it on hold then.

Alatar:

--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on March 07, 2010, 05:33:39 pm ---
--- Quote from: Alatar on March 07, 2010, 08:33:01 am ---my working copy now has more fixes =).

--- End quote ---
Which in particular? Meaning: Are they related to the tabswitch? This would put it on hold then.

--- End quote ---

One of them is related to the tabswitcher, but not to the stack-based switching (simple add some info about tab to bottom area of tab switcher). I want to post it after this one would be accepted or refused.
http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,11885.0.html

Alatar:
And by the way, I still don`t know where should I place code for stack rebuild when stack-based switching turn on/off.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version