Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > CodeCompletion redesign

typedef to class？

<< < (3/3)

MortenMacFly:

--- Quote from: blueshake on August 12, 2009, 02:10:20 pm ---
--- Quote ---Oops - that makes me wonder. Because the used to work...?!
--- End quote ---
sorry! I don't know it doesn't work before.

--- End quote ---
What I meant is that we did several modifications to CC that such constructs were parsed correctly (~1 year back). And in fact it worked! som something we applied in the meantime broke this feature (again).

[/quote]
--- Quote from: blueshake on August 12, 2009, 02:10:20 pm ---by the way . what does it mean of "Oops".

--- End quote ---
Nothing, really. It's a word you shout out if something happens you don't expect.

blueshake:
@MortenMacFly

i think the cc can use the followed patch to make codes below parsed correctly.

--- Code: ---typedef class sStruct tStruct;
--- End code ---


--- Code: ---Index: parserthread.cpp
===================================================================
--- parserthread.cpp (revision 5731)
+++ parserthread.cpp (working copy)
@@ -1249,6 +1337,63 @@              
                
                struct HiddenStruct yy;
               */
+                if (m_ParsingTypedef)
+                {
+         m_Tokenizer.UngetToken();
+                     break;
+                }
                if (TokenExists(current, m_pLastParent, tkClass))
               {
                    if (!TokenExists(next, m_pLastParent, tkVariable) )
--- End code ---

--- Code: ---+    Token* tdef = DoAddToken(tkClass, components.front(), lineNr, 0, 0, args);
-       //Token* tdef = DoAddToken(tkTypedef, components.front(), lineNr, 0, 0, args);
--- End code ---

blueshake:
see the attachment,

[attachment deleted by admin]

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page