Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Development
Splitting debugger in two - specific debugger and common GUI
oBFusCATed:
--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on February 25, 2012, 05:30:47 pm ---BTW: SVN access to this plugin is not possible for me anymore ("Unknown host: smrt.is-a-geek.org"). Did you move it?
--- End quote ---
I've lost the domain name and now I use different one cmpt.benbmp.org.
I doubt it is usable in production, thought. I've tried to build it on centos, but failed, so I don't use it actively at the moment.
And unfortunately I can't find enough time and concentration to work on it.
cbexaminr:
--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on January 31, 2012, 09:07:45 pm ---... I had the weird idea to run C::B with only the debugger plugin and see how well C::B would work as debugger front end.
--- End quote ---
Morten - FWIW - I was _not_ running debugger plugin only (AsFarAsIKnow), but I think I did have such functionality working in the stuff presented back around and/or prior to this post:
http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,10908.msg98311.html#msg98311
as I wanted/needed such functionality (and would _still_ like to have it within C::B). My efforts at that time were not, however, accepted and applied.
If you're interested in such functionality, you might look at the patches I submitted then against their related source control versions, and find whatever changes I made at that time.
--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on January 31, 2012, 09:07:45 pm ---So far, "nothing" without a project works, and loading a project without an active compiler plugin is rejected. (:-\) But what also does not work is attaching to a process. Then I see this message:
---------------------------
Error
---------------------------
This project is configured to use an invalid debugger.
The operation failed...
---------------------------
OK
---------------------------
However, that is not correct, because there is no need for a project and the debugger is setup correctly. Maybe you see a chance to make this work... ;-)
--- End quote ---
MortenMacFly:
--- Quote from: cbexaminr on March 02, 2012, 09:20:46 pm ---
--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on January 31, 2012, 09:07:45 pm ---... I had the weird idea to run C::B with only the debugger plugin and see how well C::B would work as debugger front end.
--- End quote ---
http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,10908.msg98311.html#msg98311
--- End quote ---
Well this patch embeds not only one, but many changes. Is it possible, that for each change you create an own patch (that's how it always should be).
MortenMacFly:
--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on March 03, 2012, 01:04:50 pm ---Well this patch embeds not only one, but many changes. Is it possible, that for each change you create an own patch (that's how it always should be).
--- End quote ---
Sorry, to say this, but my trials to apply the patch on trunk of the debugger's branch failed miserably. I guess w/o an update (you might have continued to use it in your local copy) it will be hard to see if that's what I had in mind...
oBFusCATed:
The patch won't apply, because the GetCommandLine has been change. But if you read, my comments about the patch, you'll see that I'm pretty much against it.
This a plugin specific feature, which should not be required by all other plugins implementing a debugger.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version