Code::Blocks
November 23, 2014, 11:30:15 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Don't forget to check the Nightly builds in the appropriate forum.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  :: WebsiteWiki  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Send this topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: The 27 September 2007 build will NOT be out.  (Read 5194 times)
killerbot
Administrator
Lives here!
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4825


« on: September 27, 2007, 05:33:43 pm »

no commits
Logged
Grom
Almost regular
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 206



« Reply #1 on: September 27, 2007, 07:40:30 pm »

Time to make a realize. C::B is not popular enough due to the problems with realizes.
Logged

gcc+winXP+suse.
Blue-Tiger
Advanced newcomer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 25


« Reply #2 on: September 28, 2007, 02:00:49 pm »

I assume you meant to say "release", in which case I'd almost agree. Except that C::B _IS_ quite popular, but it definitely would help beginners to have a "Compiler + IDE"-package they could grab and start coding. The whole "download a nightly, the DLL and install mingw etc." thing is a bit tedious... but of course this is not the place to discuss these issues, so sorry for being off-topic Wink
« Last Edit: September 28, 2007, 02:05:52 pm by Blue-Tiger » Logged
nenin
Advanced newcomer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 92


« Reply #3 on: September 29, 2007, 03:47:48 pm »

Time to make a realize. C::B is not popular enough due to the problems with realizes.
At least it is time for next RC. I found in programmers` forums that a lot of peoples, most likely students, are very interested in "compact, free C/C++ compiler with IDE".
Logged
Seronis
Almost regular
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 197



« Reply #4 on: September 29, 2007, 05:54:45 pm »

At least it is time for next RC.

Except that calling it that would be lieing.  RC means Release Candidate, which means that in the devs honest opinion "this exact release" might become the v1.0 without any further changes.  Its been very well stated that the devs have further plans and redesign issues they want to accomplish before they are comfortable calling a given revision 1.0.  So lets allow them to work at their pace and call something a  v1.0 (or an RC for it) when they are ready and comfortable doing so.

Now on the other hand if  r4500 just happens to be a really stable revision, it might be worth having someone go ahead and make a package.  But please dont call it RC3 unless it really -is- an RC.
Logged
nenin
Advanced newcomer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 92


« Reply #5 on: September 30, 2007, 06:46:45 pm »

At least it is time for next RC.

Except that calling it that would be lieing.  RC means Release Candidate, which means that <***>
Now this peoples downloads currently available RC2 - 1.0rc2 (dated Oct 25, 2005) It is just fine, is not it?  :mrgreen:
Logged
slasher-fun
Guest
« Reply #6 on: September 30, 2007, 11:15:47 pm »

It seems I missed something : why are the linux releases no more "officially" published since nightly 4439 ?  :?
Logged
stahta01
Lives here!
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4454


WWW
« Reply #7 on: September 30, 2007, 11:56:22 pm »

It seems I missed something : why are the linux releases no more "officially" published since nightly 4439 ?  :?

I have no idea, but one of the people who makes the Linux builds said he was busy and will be missing some builds. This might be the cause.

Tim S
Logged

C Programmer working to learn more about C++.
Compiling CB Trunk against wxWidgets WX_3_0_BRANCH branch.
--
When in doubt, read the CB WiKi FAQ. http://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=Main_Page
ivucica
Advanced newcomer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 14


« Reply #8 on: October 04, 2007, 09:44:03 pm »

At least it is time for next RC.

Except that calling it that would be lieing.  RC means Release Candidate, which means that in the devs honest opinion "this exact release" might become the v1.0 without any further changes.  Its been very well stated that the devs have further plans and redesign issues they want to accomplish before they are comfortable calling a given revision 1.0.  So lets allow them to work at their pace and call something a  v1.0 (or an RC for it) when they are ready and comfortable doing so.

Now on the other hand if  r4500 just happens to be a really stable revision, it might be worth having someone go ahead and make a package.  But please dont call it RC3 unless it really -is- an RC.
In such case it would be good to release more properly packaged "alpha" versions.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Send this topic  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!