Author Topic: The 01 October 2007 build (4503) is out.  (Read 32656 times)

Offline killerbot

  • Administrator
  • Lives here!
  • *****
  • Posts: 5144
The 01 October 2007 build (4503) is out.
« on: October 01, 2007, 06:49:27 pm »
Get quick announcements through the RSS feed http://www.codeblocks.org/nightly/CodeBlock_RSS.xml

Before you use a nightly make sure you understand how it works.

A link to the unicode windows wxWidget dll for Code::Blocks : http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/wxmsw28u_gcc_cb_wx284.7z

For those who might need this one (when no MingW installed on your system) : the mingw10m.dll : http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/mingwm10.7z

The 01 October 2007 build is out.
  - Windows :
   http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/CB_20071001_rev4503_win32.7z
  - Linux :
   none

Resolved Fixed:

  • Fixed: Wrong pop-up menu in Project Tree
  • Fixed: File association detection code not detecting the files associated
  • Applied: [Patch #2191] Patch for Bug #11979 (in modified form)

Regressions/Confirmed/Annoying/Common bugs:

  • toolbar-images-not-changing-state (is a wx problem/Win XP problem)

« Last Edit: October 01, 2007, 07:51:00 pm by killerbot »

Offline Mad Scientist

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: The 11 October 2007 build (4503) is out.
« Reply #1 on: October 01, 2007, 07:02:14 pm »
It's the first by the way. (The RSS feed gives the right date.)

Offline indigo0086

  • Almost regular
  • **
  • Posts: 150
Re: The 11 October 2007 build (4503) is out.
« Reply #2 on: October 01, 2007, 07:07:04 pm »
I think they live in Europe, they're always a week or so ahead of us. 

Offline GTOnizuka

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 24
Re: The 11 October 2007 build (4503) is out.
« Reply #3 on: October 01, 2007, 07:27:04 pm »
Correct the day of the topic =) Thx as always

Offline Ceniza

  • Developer
  • Lives here!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1442
    • CenizaSOFT
Re: The 11 October 2007 build (4503) is out.
« Reply #4 on: October 01, 2007, 07:47:15 pm »
Wow, it's October 11th today? Man, I had an exam and I missed it! I was sure today was October 1st. I must be sleeping too much.

Offline pasgui

  • Almost regular
  • **
  • Posts: 165
    • LGP
Re: The 01 October 2007 build (4503) is out.
« Reply #5 on: October 01, 2007, 07:50:05 pm »
Build for Ubuntu i386/amd64 can be found here
« Last Edit: October 02, 2007, 08:33:16 pm by pasgui »

Offline killerbot

  • Administrator
  • Lives here!
  • *****
  • Posts: 5144
Re: The 11 October 2007 build (4503) is out.
« Reply #6 on: October 01, 2007, 07:50:44 pm »
 :shock: :shock: :shock:

woops, maybe I should sleep instead of you Ceniza ;-)

Offline Grom

  • Almost regular
  • **
  • Posts: 206
Re: The 01 October 2007 build (4503) is out.
« Reply #7 on: October 01, 2007, 09:21:35 pm »
So many fixes during the last few days... :shock:

What about the road map:

XML-based configuration system
XML-based compiler framework
Property-based build system
Automatic updates
Usability and stability fixes for code completion plugin
Regression and bug handling.

Do somebody sometime update the road map in WiKi :?:
« Last Edit: October 01, 2007, 09:26:40 pm by Grom »
gcc+winXP+suse.

Online stahta01

  • Lives here!
  • ****
  • Posts: 6483
    • My Best Post
Re: The 01 October 2007 build (4503) is out.
« Reply #8 on: October 02, 2007, 12:59:15 am »
Do somebody sometime update the road map in WiKi :?:

Yes, but IIRC the status has not changed in the past few months.

Tim S
C Programmer working to learn more about C++ and Git.
On Windows 7 64 bit and Windows 10 32 bit.
On Debian Stretch, compiling CB Trunk against wxWidgets 3.0.
--
When in doubt, read the CB WiKi FAQ. http://wiki.codeblocks.org

Offline Grom

  • Almost regular
  • **
  • Posts: 206
Re: The 01 October 2007 build (4503) is out.
« Reply #9 on: October 02, 2007, 01:23:48 am »
Would be grate to see the accomplished steps...  :shock:
gcc+winXP+suse.

Offline davidcosse

  • Single posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: The 01 October 2007 build (4503) is out.
« Reply #10 on: October 02, 2007, 03:07:43 pm »
Dear all,
Using Mandriva 2008 linux i would like to know how to install code::block on it ?
Thank you


Offline Xaviou

  • Regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 286
    • X@v's wxStuff
Re: The 01 October 2007 build (4503) is out.
« Reply #12 on: October 02, 2007, 05:45:50 pm »
Ubuntu 6.10 & 7.04 Amd64 tar.gz archive (containing '.deb' installers builds with wx284) can be found here.
The french wxWidgets site : http://www.wxdev.fr
My wxWidgets's stuff : https://wxstuff.xaviou.fr/

Offline indigo0086

  • Almost regular
  • **
  • Posts: 150
Re: The 01 October 2007 build (4503) is out.
« Reply #13 on: October 03, 2007, 12:08:05 am »
When I try to debug (on a particular project) it's telling me "no source file named <filename>.cpp" on the list.  Other projects work fine, but not this one.

Offline jens

  • Administrator
  • Lives here!
  • *****
  • Posts: 7265
    • Jens' unofficial debian-repository for the Code::Blocks - IDE
Re: The 01 October 2007 build (4503) is out.
« Reply #14 on: October 03, 2007, 10:11:31 am »
I build a repo for debian unstable.

At the moment I use the deb-scripts from mandrav (I hope it's ok for you) that come with the source.

The repo is on a home-server so the maximum download-rate is about 200 to 300 kBit for all users.
This is planned to be changed in the future to use a "real" server.

You can put the following line to your "/et/apt/sources.list":
Code: [Select]
deb http://jens.lody.name/debian/ unstable main
The Release file is self-signed.
To add the my public-key to your trusted key list for apt use the following command:
Code: [Select]
wget -q http://jens.lody.name/debian/jens.asc -O-  | sudo apt-key add -or download it manually from http://jens.lody.name/debian/

Lucas de Vil

  • Guest
Re: The 01 October 2007 build (4503) is out.
« Reply #15 on: October 04, 2007, 04:38:02 pm »
+hm+
It seems hard to get the XP nightly since the server seems to be a little busy.

I wonder why there are no Mac OS X nightlies.
Is it still that hard to compile for OS X?
Some entries in the forums say so...

Regards
Marco
« Last Edit: October 04, 2007, 05:10:16 pm by Lucas de Vil »

Offline jens

  • Administrator
  • Lives here!
  • *****
  • Posts: 7265
    • Jens' unofficial debian-repository for the Code::Blocks - IDE
Re: The 01 October 2007 build (4503) is out.
« Reply #16 on: October 05, 2007, 05:29:12 pm »
I just changed my debian repository announced here .

Now there's a build for unstable/sid and one for stable/etch.
Both build with pbuild against the correct libraries and with the correct compilers (e.g. gcc 4.1 for etch and 4.2 for unstable).

So this line (in /etc/apt/sources.list)
Code: [Select]
deb http://jens.lody.name/debian/ unstable mainshould work for unstable,
this one
Code: [Select]
deb http://jens.lody.name/debian/ etch mainfor etch.

The place for the public-key did not change, so this command:
Code: [Select]
wget -q http://jens.lody.name/debian/jens.asc -O-  | sudo apt-key add -will fetch it and put it to apt's trusted keys.



dannygao

  • Guest
Re: The 01 October 2007 build (4503) is out.
« Reply #17 on: October 07, 2007, 05:13:43 pm »
AVR Wizard file is not correct?

line 90 of wizard.script,

Code: [Select]
pb_eepbin = _T("avr-objcopy --no-change-warnings --j .eeprom --change-section-lma .eeprom=0 -O binary $(TARGET_OUTPUT_FILE) $(TARGET_OUTPUT_FILE).eep.bin");
should be

Code: [Select]
pb_eepbin = _T("avr-objcopy --no-change-warnings -j .eeprom --change-section-lma .eeprom=0 -O binary $(TARGET_OUTPUT_FILE) $(TARGET_OUTPUT_FILE).eep.bin");
I got a built error, so i guess some thing wrong here. Not sure ;-)


Offline afb

  • Developer
  • Lives here!
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: The 01 October 2007 build (4503) is out.
« Reply #18 on: October 14, 2007, 06:29:04 pm »
I wonder why there are no Mac OS X nightlies.

The decision was made to provide montly builds instead,
as there is usually no need for users to do daily updates.

You can use the "codeblocks-devel" port from MacPorts,
as it builds directly from the SVN trunk - daily if needed.

Quote
Is it still that hard to compile for OS X?
Some entries in the forums say so...

Not really, no. :-)

It's usually better if the forum posters say so in bug reports
or direct emails, as then something can be done about it...

Offline cieszak

  • Single posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • http://cieszak.eu
Re: The 01 October 2007 build (4503) is out.
« Reply #19 on: March 12, 2008, 11:06:14 pm »
This is still not fixed (currently it is 90 line of share\CodeBlocks\templates\wizard\avr\wizard.script):

AVR Wizard file is not correct?

line 90 of wizard.script,

Code: [Select]
pb_eepbin = _T("avr-objcopy --no-change-warnings --j .eeprom --change-section-lma .eeprom=0 -O binary $(TARGET_OUTPUT_FILE) $(TARGET_OUTPUT_FILE).eep.bin");
should be

Code: [Select]
pb_eepbin = _T("avr-objcopy --no-change-warnings -j .eeprom --change-section-lma .eeprom=0 -O binary $(TARGET_OUTPUT_FILE) $(TARGET_OUTPUT_FILE).eep.bin");
I got a built error, so i guess some thing wrong here. Not sure ;-)



Offline killerbot

  • Administrator
  • Lives here!
  • *****
  • Posts: 5144
Re: The 01 October 2007 build (4503) is out.
« Reply #20 on: March 12, 2008, 11:47:13 pm »
any other avr user which can confirm the "--j" should be "-j".

If anyone can confirm please do,so I can apply the suggested fix.

Offline cieszak

  • Single posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • http://cieszak.eu
Re: The 01 October 2007 build (4503) is out.
« Reply #21 on: March 13, 2008, 12:15:02 am »
it must be -j because objcopy does not recognize --j option (any version of objcopy, not only avr, i check also MinGW and it has the same parameter)


c:\WinAVR-20071221\bin>avr-objcopy.exe
Usage: avr-objcopy.exe [option(s)] in-file [out-file]
 Copies a binary file, possibly transforming it in the process
 The options are:
  -I --input-target <bfdname>      Assume input file is in format <bfdname>
  -O --output-target <bfdname>     Create an output file in format <bfdname>
  -B --binary-architecture <arch>  Set arch of output file, when input is binary

  -F --target <bfdname>            Set both input and output format to <bfdname>

     --debugging                   Convert debugging information, if possible
  -p --preserve-dates              Copy modified/access timestamps to the output

  -j --only-section <name>         Only copy section <name> into the output
     --add-gnu-debuglink=<file>    Add section .gnu_debuglink linking to <file>
  -R --remove-section <name>       Remove section <name> from the output
  -S --strip-all                   Remove all symbol and relocation information
  -g --strip-debug                 Remove all debugging symbols & sections
[cut]


c:\MinGW\bin>objcopy
Usage: objcopy [option(s)] in-file [out-file]
 Copies a binary file, possibly transforming it in the process
 The options are:
  -I --input-target <bfdname>      Assume input file is in format <bfdname>
  -O --output-target <bfdname>     Create an output file in format <bfdname>
  -B --binary-architecture <arch>  Set arch of output file, when input is binary

  -F --target <bfdname>            Set both input and output format to <bfdname>

     --debugging                   Convert debugging information, if possible
  -p --preserve-dates              Copy modified/access timestamps to the output

  -j --only-section <name>         Only copy section <name> into the output
     --add-gnu-debuglink=<file>    Add section .gnu_debuglink linking to <file>
  -R --remove-section <name>       Remove section <name> from the output
  -S --strip-all                   Remove all symbol and relocation information
  -g --strip-debug                 Remove all debugging symbols & sections
     --strip-unneeded              Remove all symbols not needed by relocations
  -N --strip-symbol <name>         Do not copy symbol <name>
[cut]

Offline Biplab

  • Developer
  • Lives here!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1874
    • Biplab's Blog
Re: The 01 October 2007 build (4503) is out.
« Reply #22 on: March 15, 2008, 07:21:14 am »
it must be -j because objcopy does not recognize --j option (any version of objcopy, not only avr, i check also MinGW and it has the same parameter)

Fixed in trunk. Thanks for the fix. :)
Be a part of the solution, not a part of the problem.