Author Topic: The 02 March 2007 build is out.  (Read 36144 times)

Offline killerbot

  • Administrator
  • Lives here!
  • *****
  • Posts: 5229
The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« on: March 02, 2007, 09:53:28 pm »
Get quick announcements through the RSS feed http://www.codeblocks.org/nightly/CodeBlock_RSS.xml

A link to the unicode windows wxWidget dll for Code::Blocks : http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/wxmsw26u_gcc_cb_wx2.6.3p2.7z

To fix the menu alignment bug introduced in wx 2.6.3 [windows only bug] we have patched wx ourselves, and that results in the following alternative dll : http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/wxmsw26u_gcc_cb_wx2.6.3p2AndCbPatch_version3.7z

For those who might need this one (when no MingW installed on your system) : the mingw10m.dll : http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/mingwm10.7z

For support of ansi builds, a link to the ansi windows wxWidget dll for Code::Blocks : http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/wxmsw26_gcc_cb_wx2.6.3p2.7z

The 02 March 2007 build is out.
  - Windows : http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/CB_20070302_rev3659_win32.7z
  - Linux :
         http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/CB_20070302_rev3659_Ubuntu6.xx.deb
         http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/CB_20070302_rev3659_suse100-102.i586.rpm (not yet)
         http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/CB_20070302_rev3659_fc4+5.i586.rpm (not yet)


Resolved Fixed:

  • OpenWatcom support has been revamped
  • wxWidgets Wizard: Added OpenWatcom Support
  • Fixed debugger to be able to stop a program while running (linux).
  • Debugger's tooltip evaluation is temporarily disabled

Regressions/Confirmed/Annoying/Common bugs:

  • toolbar-images-not-changing-state (is a wx problem/Win XP problem)
  • menu items with icon not correctly aligned (since wx263) (is fixed with our special wx263/wx28 dll)

« Last Edit: March 03, 2007, 10:35:09 am by killerbot »

Offline GTOnizuka

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 24
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #1 on: March 02, 2007, 10:32:53 pm »
Thanks as always,but a little problem: the feed is not working more :( Please adjust it,it's very useful! ;)

Forget it,now it's seems to be OK :)
« Last Edit: March 02, 2007, 10:34:41 pm by GTOnizuka »

Offline watt

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 26
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #2 on: March 02, 2007, 11:10:59 pm »
hi can install this version from source in my linux.

Offline Pecan

  • Plugin developer
  • Lives here!
  • ****
  • Posts: 2213
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #3 on: March 02, 2007, 11:42:08 pm »
hi can install this version from source in my linux.
   //-- Wiki Index
    CodeBlocks Wiki Index
   //-- Wiki Main Page
    CodeBlocks Wiki Main Page

Search the Wiki index for "building" and "compiling" and "cookbook"


http://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=Nightly_Cookbook
Nightly Cookbook - CodeBlocks

Offline watt

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 26
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #4 on: March 02, 2007, 11:57:46 pm »
hi can install this version from source in my linux.
   //-- Wiki Index
    CodeBlocks Wiki Index
   //-- Wiki Main Page
    CodeBlocks Wiki Main Page

Search the Wiki index for "building" and "compiling" and "cookbook"


http://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=Nightly_Cookbook
Nightly Cookbook - CodeBlocks


for windows i found, but to linux ... not easy ...

Offline afb

  • Developer
  • Lives here!
  • *****
  • Posts: 884

Offline AmR EiSa

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 75
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #6 on: March 03, 2007, 12:47:45 am »
what new in OpenWatcom support ?

Offline watt

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 26
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #7 on: March 03, 2007, 01:18:56 am »
Detailed instructions are on:
http://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=Installing_Code::Blocks_from_source_on_Linux

thanks!

and where i can get the source of this nightly ????? to update my version.

Offline Pecan

  • Plugin developer
  • Lives here!
  • ****
  • Posts: 2213

Offline Auria

  • Almost regular
  • **
  • Posts: 152
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #9 on: March 03, 2007, 01:32:35 am »
and where i can get the source of this nightly ????? to update my version.

How to get the source is explained in http://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=Installing_Code::Blocks_from_source_on_Linux. (You could have read it before asking!) You don't need to get the source of a specific nightly, just use SVN and you'll have the latest.

Online stahta01

  • Lives here!
  • ****
  • Posts: 6800
    • My Best Post
C Programmer working to learn more about C++ and Git.
On Windows 7 64 bit and Windows 10 32 bit.
On Debian Stretch, compiling CB Trunk against wxWidgets 3.0.
--
When in doubt, read the CB WiKi FAQ. http://wiki.codeblocks.org

jbreen

  • Guest
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #11 on: March 03, 2007, 03:41:15 am »
I don't know if it's something new or possibly because code::blocks is developed and packaged using Ubuntu, but I am using debian etch and when I do debian/rules binary to build a code::blocks deb, I get an error dh_iconcache: command not found.

A little research revealed that dh_iconcache is implemented in Ubuntu's debhelper 5.0.40, but not debian's and that there appear to not currently be any plans to bring it into debian in the near future.

I wound up working around it by editing the debian/rules file and commenting out that line - with it in place, I can't build a deb of code::blocks.

Hope this helps somebody out...

John Breen

Offline Biplab

  • Developer
  • Lives here!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1874
    • Biplab's Blog
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #12 on: March 03, 2007, 04:19:01 am »
what new in OpenWatcom support ?

Major Changes:
  • Removes the registry key check during auto-detection. It's been found that OpenWatcom (OW) does not create any registry key.
  • Appropriate Include Dirs , Library Dirs and Resource Include Dirs have been added for OpenWatcom 1.6.
  • Linking is now done with wlink.exe
  • Linker options, object files and resource objects are now mapped for wlink.exe
  • Fixed bug in linking DLL with debug information.
  • Fixed issue with parsing Warning Notes as Error Messages. Now it should properly report Warnings and Errors in Build-log.

OpenWatcom should now be able to compile and link most of the projects successfully. wxWidgets project wizard will now allow user to compile wxWidgets app with OpenWatcom. Tested with OpenWatcom 1.6 :)
« Last Edit: March 03, 2007, 04:59:07 am by Biplab »
Be a part of the solution, not a part of the problem.

Offline AmR EiSa

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 75
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #13 on: March 03, 2007, 05:38:54 am »
ok what about compile and link lib & elf for linux in windows and anther OSs OW support it ?

Offline Biplab

  • Developer
  • Lives here!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1874
    • Biplab's Blog
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #14 on: March 03, 2007, 06:36:47 am »
ok what about compile and link lib & elf for linux in windows and anther OSs OW support it ?

Changes are for windows only. I didn't understand elf for Linux! :?

But Linux compiler of OW is in experimental stage and I've not tested it. OS2 is supported by OW but not by C::B. :)
Be a part of the solution, not a part of the problem.

Offline AmR EiSa

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 75
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #15 on: March 03, 2007, 06:42:16 am »
OW can compile .lib for linux and .elf for linux too it's Application file for linux , OW make this for linux in windows

Offline Biplab

  • Developer
  • Lives here!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1874
    • Biplab's Blog
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #16 on: March 03, 2007, 07:33:19 am »
Thanks for the informations.  :)

No, it doesn't support that at this point. But they will be added in future. :)

I'll update it to accept user-specified linker option today. Then you can manually specify the option to generate *.elf files. Once the support is added, this will less troublesome to do. :)

Regards,

Biplab
Be a part of the solution, not a part of the problem.

Poobah

  • Guest
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #17 on: March 03, 2007, 11:37:12 am »
Thanks as always,but a little problem: the feed is not working more :( Please adjust it,it's very useful! ;)

Forget it,now it's seems to be OK :)
Speaking of which, is there a feed with only, say, the latest ten updates? It's become far too big.

Offline killerbot

  • Administrator
  • Lives here!
  • *****
  • Posts: 5229
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #18 on: March 03, 2007, 02:22:40 pm »
Thanks as always,but a little problem: the feed is not working more :( Please adjust it,it's very useful! ;)

Forget it,now it's seems to be OK :)
Speaking of which, is there a feed with only, say, the latest ten updates? It's become far too big.

:-)


I could cut off N-10   ;-)

Offline Alturin

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 79
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #19 on: March 03, 2007, 03:01:07 pm »
Get a proper feed reader? :P
C'mon, most readers allow you to specify how many entries you want to see!

Offline GTOnizuka

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 24
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #20 on: March 03, 2007, 03:17:05 pm »
Get a proper feed reader? :P
C'mon, most readers allow you to specify how many entries you want to see!

For example i use google reader and i can see from 1 to 9 entries ;)

Offline Alturin

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 79
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #21 on: March 03, 2007, 05:23:03 pm »
Get a proper feed reader? :P
C'mon, most readers allow you to specify how many entries you want to see!

For example i use google reader and i can see from 1 to 9 entries ;)

Exactly ;)
Google Reader + Google Homepage = ?

Offline AmR EiSa

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 75
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #22 on: March 03, 2007, 09:17:44 pm »
Thanks for the informations.  :)

you are welcome any time , and i mast say thanks for wxScript

But they will be added in future. :)

I hope so.

I'll update it to accept user-specified linker option today. Then you can manually specify the option to generate *.elf files. Once the support is added, this will less troublesome to do. :)

I hope that not for linux only but for anther OSs like OS2 & freebsd and ....

Regards,
AmR EiSa

Offline Jan van den Borst

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 99
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #23 on: March 04, 2007, 12:28:20 am »
LS,
I was playing around with the precompiled header feature described in the  codeblocks wiki. However it doesn't work with the "flat objects" compiler option. Is this a bug or am I doing something wrong. This applies to the mingw compiler (win32)

However I got it to work using visual studio 2005. That is great.

Hope somebody knows a workaround for gcc and flat object compiler setting

Jan

Offline Biplab

  • Developer
  • Lives here!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1874
    • Biplab's Blog
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #24 on: March 04, 2007, 06:00:55 am »
and i mast say thanks for wxScript

Did you try the OW+wxWizard?

I hope so.

Yes they will be. There might be some delay (I hope NO delay), but it will be added. ;)

I'll update it to accept user-specified linker option today. Then you can manually specify the option to generate *.elf files. Once the support is added, this will less troublesome to do. :)

I hope that not for linux only but for anther OSs like OS2 & freebsd and ....

This is for OW only where you can specify any additional or advanced linker option to wlink.exe and this is already added. It was there in C::B, I turned it off during the first commit and turned it on in the second commit. Regarding other OS, we'll try; at least I'll add it for Linux (I use OpenSUSE). :)

Regards,

Biplab
Be a part of the solution, not a part of the problem.

Offline AmR EiSa

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 75
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #25 on: March 04, 2007, 08:19:08 am »
Did you try the OW+wxWizard?
No i don't at this time i resetup my windows and i will setup RH9 soon , sorry for that  :?

Regards,
AmE EiSa

Offline AmR EiSa

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 75
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #26 on: March 04, 2007, 08:35:06 am »
I can't build default App :(
see log files

[attachment deleted by admin]

Offline Biplab

  • Developer
  • Lives here!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1874
    • Biplab's Blog
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #27 on: March 04, 2007, 09:32:08 am »
I can't build default App :(
see log files

I can see from your log that Release Target is built successfully. Debug Target has failed as you are linking it against Release lib. Try linking it against Debug lib of wxWidgets (Means compiled with __WXDEBUG__ on). The error will not come up. :)

I've just retested it and wizard adds appropriate libs in appropriate target. :)

Regards,

Biplab
Be a part of the solution, not a part of the problem.

Offline watt

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 26
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #28 on: March 04, 2007, 11:09:43 pm »
nooooooooooo i can't believe ... i read the tutorials... but the codeblocks don't work ...
i get the codeblocks.rc2 from official website, and i get the files on svn.
i enter in the truck/
./bootstrap
(no errors)
./configure
(no errors)
./make
(no errors)
./make install
(no errors)

codeblocks nothing

Offline Pecan

  • Plugin developer
  • Lives here!
  • ****
  • Posts: 2213
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #29 on: March 04, 2007, 11:44:13 pm »
nooooooooooo i can't believe ... i read the tutorials... but the codeblocks don't work ...
i get the codeblocks.rc2 from official website, and i get the files on svn.
i enter in the truck/
./bootstrap
(no errors)
./configure
(no errors)
./make
(no errors)
./make install
(no errors)

codeblocks nothing

What do you mean "codeblocks nothing" ? Details please.

Did you cd .../src/codeblocks/devel
./run.sh

Offline watt

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 26
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #30 on: March 04, 2007, 11:57:52 pm »
ups sorry the "codeblocks nothing" ... codeblocks dont work
./run.sh, i dont see

Offline Pecan

  • Plugin developer
  • Lives here!
  • ****
  • Posts: 2213
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #31 on: March 05, 2007, 12:01:50 am »
ups sorry the "codeblocks nothing" ... codeblocks dont work
./run.sh, i dont see

   //-- Please Provide more information
   Would you state your CodeBlocks and compiler version, and your Operating System.
   Also state  your wxWidgets version if you're using one.

Which OS are we talking about.

Offline watt

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 26
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #32 on: March 05, 2007, 12:07:46 am »
im trying instalation codeblocks in archlinux and i have wxWidgets 2.6.3

Offline Pecan

  • Plugin developer
  • Lives here!
  • ****
  • Posts: 2213
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #33 on: March 05, 2007, 12:10:04 am »
im trying instalation codeblocks in archlinux and i have wxWidgets 2.6.3

If you see a file in .../src named "update", then run it:
cd .../trunk/src
./update

then cd devel
./run.sh

Offline watt

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 26
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #34 on: March 05, 2007, 12:15:14 am »
[[email protected] src]# ./update
Creating output directory tree
Compressing core UI resources
Compressing plugins UI resources
Packing core UI bitmaps
Packing plugins UI bitmaps
Copying files
cp: cannot stat `devel/codeblocks': No such file or directory
cp: cannot stat `devel/*.so': No such file or directory
cp: cannot stat `devel/share/codeblocks/plugins/*.so': No such file or directory
Stripping debug info from output tree
Creating launch-scripts

huuuummmmmmm ... i'm lost i dont have a directory devel ....

Offline watt

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 26
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #35 on: March 05, 2007, 12:23:14 am »
i think i fail this step ...

cd ~/devel
tar zxf codeblocks-1.0rc2.tar.gz

This will create the directory ~/devel/codeblocks-1.0rc2. Change to the source code directory, by issuing the following command:

cd codeblocks-1.0rc2

i extract the file codeblocks-1.0rc2.tar.gz but i dont copy the files and directorys as inside codeblocks-1.0rc2 to devel ... the problem is there ?

Offline Pecan

  • Plugin developer
  • Lives here!
  • ****
  • Posts: 2213
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #36 on: March 05, 2007, 12:41:21 am »
i think i fail this step ...

cd ~/devel
tar zxf codeblocks-1.0rc2.tar.gz

This will create the directory ~/devel/codeblocks-1.0rc2. Change to the source code directory, by issuing the following command:

cd codeblocks-1.0rc2

i extract the file codeblocks-1.0rc2.tar.gz but i dont copy the files and directorys as inside codeblocks-1.0rc2 to devel ... the problem is there ?

Stop this nonsense. RC2 is a dead horse. Remove all rc2 files.

Read this:
http://codeblocks.org/source_code.shtml

Then read this:
http://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=Installing_Code::Blocks_from_source_on_Linux
Installing Code::Blocks from source on Linux - CodeBlocks

and this:
http://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=Compiling_Code::Blocks_in_Linux_%28applies_to_all_distros%29
Installing Code::Blocks from source on Linux - CodeBlocks

and this:
http://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=Compiling_Code::Blocks_in_RPM_based_distributions
Compiling Code::Blocks in RPM based distributions

Go to wiki.codeblocks.org. Click on index at the bottom of the page.
Look in the index for "Linux", "compiling" "installing", etc.

« Last Edit: March 05, 2007, 12:54:06 am by Pecan »

Offline watt

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 26
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #37 on: March 05, 2007, 01:02:45 am »
then
i create a directory devel and i use svn to get the file and run ...
./bootstrap
./configure
make
make install
thats all ??

Offline Pecan

  • Plugin developer
  • Lives here!
  • ****
  • Posts: 2213
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #38 on: March 05, 2007, 01:21:24 am »
then
i create a directory devel and i use svn to get the file and run ...
./bootstrap
./configure
make
make install
thats all ??


I don't know anything about archLinux. But I believe you'd better make sure you have the GTK, the wxGTK, the correct gtk-dev packages specified in the articles I pointed out.

If all that is correct, then yes, that's all you need to do.

Offline Biplab

  • Developer
  • Lives here!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1874
    • Biplab's Blog
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #39 on: March 05, 2007, 02:57:11 am »
then
i create a directory devel and i use svn to get the file and run ...
./bootstrap
./configure
make
make install
thats all ??

In case you are not in SU mode, you need to issue make install in SU mode. So the correct step would be-
  • ./bootstrap
  • ./configure --enable-contrib (In case you want the contrib plugins)
  • make
  • make install (In SU mode)

Regarding run.sh not executing, please check whether the run.sh have execute permission or not. I faced this sometimes back and Pecan helped me solve that. :)
Be a part of the solution, not a part of the problem.

Poobah

  • Guest
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #40 on: March 05, 2007, 05:42:51 am »
Get a proper feed reader? :P
C'mon, most readers allow you to specify how many entries you want to see!

Is there any way to do this with the built-in Firefox one?

Offline watt

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 26
Re: The 02 March 2007 build is out.
« Reply #41 on: March 06, 2007, 11:23:20 pm »
well i find the run.sh ... but wen i run ./run.h has this error:
./run.sh: line 4: /home/watt/devel/codeblocks/src/devel/codeblocks: No such file or directory

buen wen i run the ./update appear this  error:
./update
Creating output directory tree
Compressing core UI resources
Compressing plugins UI resources
Packing core UI bitmaps
Packing plugins UI bitmaps
Copying files
cp: cannot stat `devel/codeblocks': No such file or directory
cp: cannot stat `devel/*.so': No such file or directory
cp: cannot stat `devel/share/codeblocks/plugins/*.so': No such file or directory
Stripping debug info from output tree
Creating launch-scripts