Author Topic: wxWidgets official release 2.6.3  (Read 21559 times)

Offline MortenMacFly

  • Administrator
  • Lives here!
  • *****
  • Posts: 9496
Re: wxWidgets official release 2.6.3
« Reply #15 on: March 20, 2006, 10:38:46 pm »
Quote
You said the client size is 592 - so where are the 200 pixels difference to 792 are coming from?
They come from me being tired... :)  They're 792 pixels, of course.
Ahh, alright - I see. So it's 800 pixel minus 2x4 pixel border, right?
With regards, Morten.
Compiler logging: Settings->Compiler & Debugger->tab "Other"->Compiler logging="Full command line"
C::B Manual: http://www.codeblocks.org/docs/main_codeblocks_en.html
C::B FAQ: http://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=FAQ

Offline thomas

  • Administrator
  • Lives here!
  • *****
  • Posts: 3979
Re: wxWidgets official release 2.6.3
« Reply #16 on: March 20, 2006, 10:40:00 pm »
Right :)
"We should forget about small efficiencies, say about 97% of the time: Premature quotation is the root of public humiliation."

Offline takeshi miya

  • Lives here!
  • ****
  • Posts: 1487
Re: Partial Solution? -> wxWidgets official release 2.6.3
« Reply #17 on: March 21, 2006, 12:49:13 am »
BTW: The bestw value is computed in manager.cpp which is part of wxAUI - So I agree with Takeshi Miya who in another topic (I forgot where) pointed to wxAUI, too.
By principle, I tend to always take the opposite of what Takeshi says for granted.

Just to clarify, I never said that wxAUI was the guilty. :?

Offline MortenMacFly

  • Administrator
  • Lives here!
  • *****
  • Posts: 9496
Re: Partial Solution? -> wxWidgets official release 2.6.3
« Reply #18 on: March 21, 2006, 07:19:48 am »
Just to clarify, I never said that wxAUI was the guilty. :?
I was refering to this one:
http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php?topic=2374.msg18812#msg18812
but you are right: You said it "it's probably" and I said you "pointed to" wxAUI. So no offense.
With regards, Morten.
Compiler logging: Settings->Compiler & Debugger->tab "Other"->Compiler logging="Full command line"
C::B Manual: http://www.codeblocks.org/docs/main_codeblocks_en.html
C::B FAQ: http://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=FAQ

Offline takeshi miya

  • Lives here!
  • ****
  • Posts: 1487
Re: Partial Solution? -> wxWidgets official release 2.6.3
« Reply #19 on: March 21, 2006, 07:53:04 am »
Just to clarify, I never said that wxAUI was the guilty. :?
I was refering to this one:
http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php?topic=2374.msg18812#msg18812
but you are right: You said it "it's probably" and I said you "pointed to" wxAUI. So no offense.
With regards, Morten.

No offense taken. :)