User forums > Nightly builds

The 20 November 2016 build (10922) is out.

<< < (2/10) > >>

ollydbg:
Hi, killerbot, if possible, can you update a new wx dll file? see my suggestion here: Re: The 25 September 2016 build (10912) is out. Thanks.

BlueHazzard:

--- Quote ---applied Feature/Patch #421: Add dialog for global variables to "Edit Path" dialog
--- End quote ---
There i still this (hard) issue open (from White-Tiger) :
https://sourceforge.net/p/codeblocks/tickets/421/#d915

i think the gui code for the path dialog went messed up when "applying" the modified patch

killerbot:

--- Quote from: ollydbg on November 21, 2016, 03:48:32 pm ---Hi, killerbot, if possible, can you update a new wx dll file? see my suggestion here: Re: The 25 September 2016 build (10912) is out. Thanks.

--- End quote ---

Yes, I will do that.

BlueHazzard:

--- Quote from: hairuoai on November 22, 2016, 09:32:34 am ---I used Cb10912 to generate prime number <10000000,it took 34s in my VM win7 with gcc 6.2.0.And VC2015 took 37s.
Then i used CB10922 to do the same thing.gcc 6.2 took 51s,and vc2015 took 37s.why?

--- End quote ---
Reproducible? Your own build or a nightly?
I don't see any changes in the SVN log that can justify this...

hairuoai:

--- Quote from: BlueHazzard on November 22, 2016, 10:03:07 am ---
--- Quote from: hairuoai on November 22, 2016, 09:32:34 am ---I used Cb10912 to generate prime number <10000000,it took 34s in my VM win7 with gcc 6.2.0.And VC2015 took 37s.
Then i used CB10922 to do the same thing.gcc 6.2 took 51s,and vc2015 took 37s.why?

--- End quote ---
Reproducible? Your own build or a nightly?
I don't see any changes in the SVN log that can justify this...

--- End quote ---
maybe just fine,this time 10912 takes 36.067s,10922 takes 37.768.....i was wrong....sorry

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page