Author Topic: Automated Watch Inclusion?  (Read 3206 times)

Offline wolfcry

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 30
Automated Watch Inclusion?
« on: June 20, 2013, 11:08:07 am »
Hi Everyone,

Long time, no see or talk  :'( (lol)

Anyways, I was just wondering if there were any plans in the future to have C::B automate the inclusion of watches when debugging?

Even though I still love this wonderful piece of software, I'd be more in love with it if it had that wee bit o' convenience  ;D.

C::B Version = 10.5
OS = Microsquish XP

Offline oBFusCATed

  • Developer
  • Lives here!
  • *****
  • Posts: 11714
    • Travis build status
Re: Automated Watch Inclusion?
« Reply #1 on: June 20, 2013, 11:45:47 am »
Learn to search please.
This has been asked this week already: http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,18060.0.html
(most of the time I ignore long posts)
[strangers don't send me private messages, I'll ignore them; post a topic in the forum, but first read the rules!]

Offline MortenMacFly

  • Administrator
  • Lives here!
  • *****
  • Posts: 9488
Re: Automated Watch Inclusion?
« Reply #2 on: June 21, 2013, 06:53:11 am »
http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,18060.0.html
...and watch these threads for updates (you can subscribe to threads in forums therefore).
Compiler logging: Settings->Compiler & Debugger->tab "Other"->Compiler logging="Full command line"
C::B Manual: http://www.codeblocks.org/docs/main_codeblocks_en.html
C::B FAQ: http://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=FAQ

Offline wolfcry

  • Multiple posting newcomer
  • *
  • Posts: 30
Re: Automated Watch Inclusion?
« Reply #3 on: June 22, 2013, 02:18:30 am »
Learn to search please.
This has been asked this week already: http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,18060.0.html

Learn how NOT to be a condescending a** please. I already did that and didn't see that thread. Sorry if you jumping to conclusions inconvenienced your day. Also, OB, you've always had a way of being unnecessarily rude when people ask questions you don't like. Instead of trying to make people feel stupid and most of the time unwelcome here, which in turns sends them off supporting competitor software, how about simply not answering the questions that irritate you? You'd have less stress in your life. And your usual excuse for treating people the way you do of, "how can I know if you haven't...[insert usual blah blah here]..." doesn't fly with me. You're responsible for the way you choose to respond regardless how others present the question. Simple as that.


@MortenMacFly - Cool, will do. Thanks for the help.
« Last Edit: June 22, 2013, 03:07:37 am by wolfcry »
C::B Version = 10.5
OS = Microsquish XP

Offline oBFusCATed

  • Developer
  • Lives here!
  • *****
  • Posts: 11714
    • Travis build status
Re: Automated Watch Inclusion?
« Reply #4 on: June 22, 2013, 10:07:20 am »
« Last Edit: June 22, 2013, 10:12:14 am by oBFusCATed »
(most of the time I ignore long posts)
[strangers don't send me private messages, I'll ignore them; post a topic in the forum, but first read the rules!]