Author Topic: The 02 June 2011 build (7178) is out.  (Read 11632 times)

Offline killerbot

  • Administrator
  • Lives here!
  • *****
  • Posts: 4827
The 02 June 2011 build (7178) is out.
« on: June 02, 2011, 11:11:35 pm »
Get quick announcements through the RSS feed http://www.codeblocks.org/nightly/CodeBlock_RSS.xml

Before you use a nightly make sure you understand how it works.

A link to the unicode windows wxWidget dll for Code::Blocks : http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/wxmsw28u_gcc_cb_wx2812_gcc452-TDM.7z

For those who might need this one (when no MingW installed on your system) : the mingw10m.dll : http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/mingwm10_gcc452-TDM.7z

The 02 June 2011 build is out.
  - Windows :
   http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/CB_20110602_rev7178_win32.7z
  - Linux :
   none

Resolved Fixed:

  • added $TO_ABSOLUTE_PATH macro, can be used for compiler/linkeroptions to turn relative paths into absolute paths
  • CC: Code clean up

Regressions/Confirmed/Annoying/Common bugs:



    Offline ahui886

    • Advanced newcomer
    • *
    • Posts: 28
    Re: The 02 June 2011 build (7178) is out.
    « Reply #1 on: June 03, 2011, 05:05:09 am »
    great,thanks...

    Offline Lelouch

    • Newcomer
    • *
    • Posts: 6
    Re: The 02 June 2011 build (7178) is out.
    « Reply #2 on: June 03, 2011, 11:46:59 am »
    After the change of files in some project, sometimes I need to "reparse" the whole project to make the "code-completion" work..

    I think it could be done automatically

    Is it possible?

    Offline jens

    • Administrator
    • Lives here!
    • *****
    • Posts: 6665
      • Jens unofficial debian-repository for the Code::Blocks - IDE
    Re: The 02 June 2011 build (7178) is out.
    « Reply #3 on: June 03, 2011, 01:55:11 pm »
    Debian packages (binaries and sources) for 32-bit and 64-bit systems can be found in my repo.
    Regards

    Jens  Debian - nightlies (and release) : http://apt.jenslody.de/ Fedora [18 - 20]- and CentOS/RedHat [5, 6 & 7] - nightlies : http://rpm.jenslody.de/

    Offline Lelouch

    • Newcomer
    • *
    • Posts: 6
    Re: The 02 June 2011 build (7178) is out.
    « Reply #4 on: June 11, 2011, 07:03:53 pm »
    Still that problem

    when we have char array as one variable, every other variables below will mix up with char array in watch window

    eg:

    char str[BUF_LEN];
    int a, b; //a, b will be mixed with str, so it's hard to see a, b


    Offline jens

    • Administrator
    • Lives here!
    • *****
    • Posts: 6665
      • Jens unofficial debian-repository for the Code::Blocks - IDE
    Re: The 02 June 2011 build (7178) is out.
    « Reply #5 on: June 11, 2011, 08:06:36 pm »
    Still that problem

    when we have char array as one variable, every other variables below will mix up with char array in watch window

    eg:

    char str[BUF_LEN];
    int a, b; //a, b will be mixed with str, so it's hard to see a, b



    And the answer is still the same:
    Is this only my own experience?
    No, it is not, probably this bug is fixed in the debugger_branch. There the watches are vastly improved.

    The fix will not make it into trunk, unless the debugger-branch is remerged with it.
    So you have to live with it, or use one of the (more rare) debugger-branch nightlies.
    Regards

    Jens  Debian - nightlies (and release) : http://apt.jenslody.de/ Fedora [18 - 20]- and CentOS/RedHat [5, 6 & 7] - nightlies : http://rpm.jenslody.de/

    Offline gbr

    • Newcomer
    • *
    • Posts: 4
    Re: The 02 June 2011 build (7178) is out.
    « Reply #6 on: June 12, 2011, 03:55:23 pm »
    Still that problem

    when we have char array as one variable, every other variables below will mix up with char array in watch window

    eg:

    char str[BUF_LEN];
    int a, b; //a, b will be mixed with str, so it's hard to see a, b



    And the answer is still the same:
    Is this only my own experience?
    No, it is not, probably this bug is fixed in the debugger_branch. There the watches are vastly improved.

    The fix will not make it into trunk, unless the debugger-branch is remerged with it.
    So you have to live with it, or use one of the (more rare) debugger-branch nightlies.

    I'm more of a lurker on the forums than anything else, but I use the nightly builds extensively.

    Are there plans to do the merge in the future, or is the debugger_branch considered a separate product?

    Gerald

    Offline jens

    • Administrator
    • Lives here!
    • *****
    • Posts: 6665
      • Jens unofficial debian-repository for the Code::Blocks - IDE
    Re: The 02 June 2011 build (7178) is out.
    « Reply #7 on: June 12, 2011, 04:01:37 pm »
    Are there plans to do the merge in the future, or is the debugger_branch considered a separate product?

    It will be remerged with trunk as soon as possible.
    Regards

    Jens  Debian - nightlies (and release) : http://apt.jenslody.de/ Fedora [18 - 20]- and CentOS/RedHat [5, 6 & 7] - nightlies : http://rpm.jenslody.de/

    Offline stahta01

    • Lives here!
    • ****
    • Posts: 4472
      • My Best Post
    Re: The 02 June 2011 build (7178) is out.
    « Reply #8 on: June 17, 2011, 05:52:16 pm »
    Patch needed for Code::Blocks under Windows when not using PCH.

    Tim S.

    Code: [Select]
    Index: src/sdk/pipedprocess.cpp
    ===================================================================
    --- src/sdk/pipedprocess.cpp (revision 7241)
    +++ src/sdk/pipedprocess.cpp (working copy)
    @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
         #include <wx/app.h>         // wxWakeUpIdle
         #include "pipedprocess.h" // class' header file
         #include "sdk_events.h"
    +    #include "globals.h"        // UnixFilename
     #endif
     
     
    C Programmer working to learn more about C++.
    Compiling CB Trunk against wxWidgets WX_3_0_BRANCH branch.
    --
    When in doubt, read the CB WiKi FAQ. http://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=Main_Page

    Offline killerbot

    • Administrator
    • Lives here!
    • *****
    • Posts: 4827
    Re: The 02 June 2011 build (7178) is out.
    « Reply #9 on: June 17, 2011, 05:58:58 pm »
    done, thanks Tim