...version, platform please? Did you try the debugger branch?
What is a "debugger branch"?http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,15947.0.html (http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,15947.0.html)
What is a "debugger branch"?http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,15947.0.html (http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,15947.0.html)
Yes, this should work.What is a "debugger branch"?http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,15947.0.html (http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,15947.0.html)
This is all rather greek to me. So let me ask this question (taken from the link you provided above). To get newer updated versions of linux64 codeblocks periodically (nightly builds or something like that), I should put the following into my ubuntu64 /etc/apt/sources.list file:
deb http://apt.jenslody.de/ any dbg
deb-src http://apt.jenslody.de/ any dbg
Then when I update my system it will install the new version? Or what?
A branch with many new debugger features, that will be merged back into trunk in the (more or less) near future.
PS: I still don't know what a "debugger branch" is? How is that different from the latest "nightly build"?
[...] I should put the following into my ubuntu64 /etc/apt/sources.list file:you should not use the main, but the dbg section !
deb http://apt.jenslody.de/ any dbg
deb-src http://apt.jenslody.de/ any dbg
[...]
7844 is not the debugger branch, as you have written yourself (highlighting by me):Yikes, confusion![...] I should put the following into my ubuntu64 /etc/apt/sources.list file:you should not use the main, but the dbg section !
deb http://apt.jenslody.de/ any dbg
deb-src http://apt.jenslody.de/ any dbg
[...]
Revision for debugger-branch in my server is 7790 actuallly.
apt-get update does not update the software, it only updates the package cache.
By the way, debugger-branch is now 7845.
You can try apt-get upgrade to update your system, but I recommend a package manager with a gui, like synaptic .
Index: src/src/cpuregistersdlg.cpp
===================================================================
--- src/src/cpuregistersdlg.cpp (revision 7856)
+++ src/src/cpuregistersdlg.cpp (working copy)
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@
}
wxString fmt;
- fmt.Printf(_T("0x%x"), (size_t)value);
+ fmt.Printf(_T("0x%lx"), /*(size_t)*/value);
m_pList->SetItem(idx, 1, fmt);
fmt.Printf(_T("%lu"), value);
m_pList->SetItem(idx, 2, fmt);
When I run codeblocks it says "svn7844" in the startup dialog and in the "help->about" dialog.
7844 is not the debugger branch, as you have written yourself (highlighting by me):[...] I should put the following into my ubuntu64 /etc/apt/sources.list file:you should not use the main, but the dbg section !
deb http://apt.jenslody.de/ any dbg
deb-src http://apt.jenslody.de/ any dbg
[...]
[...]
By the way, debugger-branch is now 7845.
As for the disassembly window not showing contents, I generally start running with "run to cursor".Exact steps, please, but first make sure you have the debugger's branch. There were some fixes in regard to the disassembly.
Another question. Is it supposed to be possible to change register values while at a breakpoint? I can't seem to find a way, but other debuggers I've seen (and written) allow that.In debugger's branch you can execute gdb commands, there is an entry box at the bottom of the debugger log.
I mean, how many people are involved, how huge or small is the project, and how practical is it for me to start fixing things I want fixed?http://developer.berlios.de/project/memberlist.php?group_id=5358
On the plus side, I figure I have the required skill. I've written complete IDEs before (editor, compiler, debugger, interactive graphicial GuiDesigner, etc), so more or less I've "been there, done that".Good to know. But in fact it shouldn't be too hard. Just make sure hat if what you want t do is related to the debugger, use the debugger branch and sync' yourself with oBFusCATed - he is the maintainer of that branch.
p.p.p.s. I guess, I can spend some time to implement this simple scheme.
Did anything ever come of this? If so, I'll install the latest nightly build.No, unfortunately
Also, are you planning a 12.05 or 12.06 release? I was guessing the 10.05 release was timed to follow the ubuntu 10.04 LTS release, which makes now a good time for a new general/binary release since ubuntu 12.04 LTS was released 1 month ago.No, 12.05 went away. 12.06 is too close it time. Also there is no point in timing a release after a major distro release, if there was a timing it would have been 10.03 or 10.2.