Code::Blocks Forums

User forums => Nightly builds => Topic started by: killerbot on January 30, 2008, 08:51:18 pm

Title: The 30 January 2008 build (4853) is out.
Post by: killerbot on January 30, 2008, 08:51:18 pm
Get quick announcements through the RSS feed http://www.codeblocks.org/nightly/CodeBlock_RSS.xml

Before you use a nightly make sure you understand how it works (http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,3232.0.html).

A link to the unicode windows wxWidget dll for Code::Blocks : http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/wxmsw28u_gcc_cb_wx287.7z

For those who might need this one (when no MingW installed on your system) : the mingw10m.dll : http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/mingwm10_gcc421.7z

The 30 January 2008 build is out.
  - Windows :
   http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/CB_20080130_rev4853_win32.7z
  - Linux :
   none

Resolved Fixed:


Regressions/Confirmed/Annoying/Common bugs:


Title: Re: The 30 January 2008 build (4853) is out.
Post by: dannyyy on January 30, 2008, 09:22:12 pm
Great ! Now wxSmith is GPL v3 !!! It makes me very happy !  :D
Title: Re: The 30 January 2008 build (4853) is out.
Post by: Jenna on January 30, 2008, 09:35:26 pm
Binaries for debian i386 and amd64 and sources can be found in my repository (see signature).
Actually it is svn4852, but svn4853 only fixes a non pch build issue.
Title: Re: The 30 January 2008 build (4853) is out.
Post by: Xaviou on January 30, 2008, 09:51:37 pm
Ubuntu 6.10 -> 7.10 Amd64 tar.gz archive (containing '.deb' installers builds with wx2.8.6) can be found here (http://www.esnips.com/web/CodeBlocks)

Is anyone still using Code::Blocks on Ubuntu 6.10 Amd64 ?
If no-one does, I'll update my chroot to 7.04, so I'll be able to provide Code::Blocks compiled with the official version 2.8.7 of wxWidgets 's libs.
Title: Re: The 30 January 2008 build (4853) is out.
Post by: pasgui on January 30, 2008, 10:49:53 pm
Build for Ubuntu i386/amd64 can be found here (http://lgp203.free.fr/spip/spip.php?article1)

Best regards, pasgui
Title: This is only an idea
Post by: Jeisson on January 31, 2008, 11:32:23 pm
This is only an idea:

Jens, Xaviou and Pasgui. I think you could join efforts and work together the Code::Blocks team for publishing the official CB Linux binaries. I don't know if it is possible, it is only an idea. I would like to listen your opinions. I think the work of all of you are great, and I am so thankful with all of you...

Best regards!
Title: Re: The 30 January 2008 build (4853) is out.
Post by: Xaviou on February 01, 2008, 01:31:12 pm
I will reply to this for Pasgui and I (if you permit me to do so, Pasgui).

I build the Amd64 version for Ubuntu, and Pasgui builds the i386 version.
He then download my debs and put them into his repository.
Doing like this, we don't have to worry about knowing if the othe has already done the compilation :
 - we both compile our version and upload it
 - when my version is uploaded, I post a reply in this forum, and Pasgui can update his repository.

I don't know if versions for Ubuntu and for Debian are compatibles with each others.
Perhaps could we have only one repository for all this versions, but I don't know if it is possible.

Regards
Xav'
Title: Re: The 30 January 2008 build (4853) is out.
Post by: Belgabor on February 01, 2008, 08:11:45 pm
Small suggestion:
would it be possibne to add namespace support to the class wizard? What I mean is an additional "Namespace" entry field that would wrap the class declaration and implementation in a namespace (Could even do a nice "} // namespace xyz end" when closing =) ).
Title: Re: The 30 January 2008 build (4853) is out.
Post by: wobien on February 02, 2008, 12:25:18 am
would it be possibne to add namespace support to the class wizard? What I mean is an additional "Namespace" entry field that would wrap the class declaration and implementation in a namespace (Could even do a nice "} // namespace xyz end" when closing =) ).
Try what happens if you call your new class Name::Foo
Title: Re: The 30 January 2008 build (4853) is out.
Post by: Belgabor on February 02, 2008, 06:30:07 am
Ah, great, thanks =)
So let me rephrase, how about a toggle that removes the subdirectory from the header/implementation files if I add a namespace? As there is enough space, a brief label telling guys like me about that feature below the class name would also be nice :p