Code::Blocks Forums
User forums => Using Code::Blocks => Topic started by: ollydbg on December 03, 2011, 02:50:23 am
-
I see when start gdb, it is:
This cause some problems, such as when a large String is put as a function argument(maybe, the wxString was loaded from a txt file), this will show all the contents of the String in the debugger log.
So, I think we can leave it as gdb default value is 200.
See:
Print Settings - Debugging with GDB (http://sourceware.org/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdb/Print-Settings.html#Print-Settings)
-
You should say, that it is only for the debugger-branch, not for trunk.
What I don't understand is, what the value of -1 means, because a value of 0 means unlimited.
-
You should say, that it is only for the debugger-branch, not for trunk.
Oh, sorry, I use only debugger branch these days.
What I don't understand is, what the value of -1 means, because a value of 0 means unlimited.
Yes, as the gdb document said, it should be 0 (not -1).
-
This is the reason:
http://svn.berlios.de/wsvn/codeblocks/branches/wxpropgrid_debugger/src/plugins/debuggergdb/gdb_driver.cpp?op=revision&rev=6393&peg=7585
ollydbg: can you give an example code?
-
ollydbg: can you give an example code?
The sample code below:
int main()
{
char * p = new char[4000];
p[1]=4;//set breakpoint here
return 0;
}
You can just "print p" at the breakpoint, then gdb will show many trash.
Also, if the pointer p is passed to a function call. then when you run a "backtrace", the trash will be shown too.
-
OK, I've added a way to control the value of the printed elements.
See Debug -> Information -> Print Elements.
-
OK, I've added a way to control the value of the printed elements.
See Debug -> Information -> Print Elements.
Thanks for implement this feature, I will test it ASAP.
-
The variable name:
should be:
right?
-
I prefer the first version.
-
I prefer the first version.
Me too. :)
But the C::B's coding standard (some page in the wiki) said we should use second version.
-
But the C::B's coding standard (some page in the wiki) said we should use second version.
This one:
http://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=Coding_style