Code::Blocks Forums
User forums => Announcements => Topic started by: mandrav on May 29, 2006, 02:02:46 pm
-
Just what the title says. The release has been postponed for the 4th or 11th of June (coming Sunday or the next).
The reasons for this don't have to do with the development state of Code::Blocks, but rather with some (small) real-life problems of two team members (me and Thomas).
Thanks for understanding :).
Yiannis.
-
I will wait... :D :D :D
-
good news
-
I was wondering if the next release would still be coming up this soon! Just judging by the roadmap as of late.
-
I will wait very patiently, and I will make sure I get the time within the next week to update my code because I may be without internet access for the whole month... Anyways, I hope you get those problems resolved! 8)
-
cool :lol:
-
Just out of curiosity - I've been trying to keep an eye on the SVN logs, and I haven't seen anything related to several of the features the Roadmap predicts for RC3, most notably the XML-based compiler framework and the property-based build system. Is RC3 going to contain all that, or is it being pushed off for a future version?
(Not trying to push, of course; just wondering.)
-
Just out of curiosity - I've been trying to keep an eye on the SVN logs, and I haven't seen anything related to several of the features the Roadmap predicts for RC3, most notably the XML-based compiler framework and the property-based build system. Is RC3 going to contain all that, or is it being pushed off for a future version?
(Not trying to push, of course; just wondering.)
The specific feature you 're mentioning, will not make it (as well as a couple of others). We tried our best but we didn't want to postpone the next release any longer. Even as it is, there are people that think C::B development has died :shock: (don't ask me why :)).
These features are being actively worked on but they haven't reached a "stable" state yet, so they 're left for v1.5. The roadmap will be updated accordingly when it's clear what made it and what didn't.
-
I'll wait for it.. :D
till that time the nightly build will keep me interested in the project. :D
cheers,
Jewe
-
The specific feature you 're mentioning, will not make it (as well as a couple of others). We tried our best but we didn't want to postpone the next release any longer. Even as it is, there are people that think C::B development has died :shock: (don't ask me why :)).
These features are being actively worked on but they haven't reached a "stable" state yet, so they 're left for v1.5. The roadmap will be updated accordingly when it's clear what made it and what didn't.
[/quote]
C::B dev died....
Uhm.... DevCpp addicted people??
Max
-
The specific feature you 're mentioning, will not make it (as well as a couple of others). We tried our best but we didn't want to postpone the next release any longer. Even as it is, there are people that think C::B development has died :shock: (don't ask me why :)).
These features are being actively worked on but they haven't reached a "stable" state yet, so they 're left for v1.5. The roadmap will be updated accordingly when it's clear what made it and what didn't.
C::B dev died....
[/quote]
:?
Uhm.... DevCpp addicted people??
:?
PS.: I can also wait for it. No problems. Take all the time you need :).
-
there are people that think C::B development has died :shock: (don't ask me why :)).
Mainly on the basis that RC2 dates so far back, which is all most visitors see on the main page before clicking away. Most will not drill down into the forum to keep posted on all the active development that is happening.
RC3 will do a lot of good for CB's reputation when it makes it to the front page. For the rest of us who visit here regularly, the nightlies already offer all (or most of) the goodies that will be in RC3 so it will have less impact. The 1.0 release however will be a real milestone since most bugs will have been eradicated and so development of even more features can then be considered.
-
I'm so glad!
Btw, do you think v1.0 Final will be ready around july or september? I know a couple of projects whose members will be glad to use C::B.
Oh - hi all :mrgreen: long time, no see. I was just passing around and thought of giving you a visit.
-
Just what the title says. The release has been postponed for the 4th or 11th of June (coming Sunday or the next).
The reasons for this don't have to do with the development state of Code::Blocks, but rather with some (small) real-life problems of two team members (me and Thomas).
Thanks for understanding :).
Yiannis.
<Moderator edit>
Deleted foreign lanuage.
Only English in these forums please.
</Moderator edit>
-
like RC2 with mingw can you make package for RC3 with wx binarys and of course mingw ?
because compiling of wx library problem for many people - look forums and for me also :oops:-
-
so what will be the difference between a nightly and a RC3 for us?
-
Just what the title says. The release has been postponed for the 4th or 11th of June (coming Sunday or the next).
The reasons for this don't have to do with the development state of Code::Blocks, but rather with some (small) real-life problems of two team members (me and Thomas).
Thanks for understanding :).
Yiannis.
<Moderator edit>
This is your second post and you still write in Chinese.
You were already told this is not allowed in these forums. English only please.
</Moderator edit>
-
Just what the title says. The release has been postponed for the 4th or 11th of June (coming Sunday or the next).
The reasons for this don't have to do with the development state of Code::Blocks, but rather with some (small) real-life problems of two team members (me and Thomas).
Thanks for understanding :).
Yiannis.
The CodeBlocks RC3 how haven't announced, is not to say that announce today?
-
is the RC3 will be released on time? I am already in 11th :P
-
maybe waiting a little bit more, some little bird told me a supercool feature is nearly ready and coming to CB soon, and a few more days for testing for you guys on the wx2.6.3 ...
-
Thanks, the development team really did a lot, it seems the final release may come soon after that :D
-
will it include a prepacked MinGW once again?
-
little bird again ... probably yes (don't kill us if it doesn't) ;-)
-
little bird again ... probably yes (don't kill us if it doesn't) ;-)
:) can you compile it with GDC support (D language GCC and GDB support) :) it shouldn't make much difference to a man who knows how to compile GCC & GDB ;) Something I wansn't able to do myself.
Anyway packaging CB with the MinGW will help much the total noobz who don't know anything about C but are oblidged to study it in school and I think there is no better tool than CB to start learning C.
-
little bird again ... probably yes (don't kill us if it doesn't) ;-)
:) can you compile it with GDC support (D language GCC and GDB support) :) it shouldn't make much difference to a man who knows how to compile GCC & GDB ;) Something I wansn't able to do myself.
Anyway packaging CB with the MinGW will help much the total noobz who don't know anything about C but are oblidged to study it in school and I think there is no better tool than CB to start learning C.
We're not compiling MinGW. That's what the MinGW team is doing ;)
Besides, if all goes well, MinGW will not be bundled with Code::Blocks. It will not need to be.
-
Besides, if all goes well, MinGW will not be bundled with Code::Blocks. It will not need to be.
Personally, I prefer this. :o
-
I don´t need it, too, but i think it would ease up the installation process a lot for new programmers. And besides that it´s nice to have a package which contains everything, so you can start immediately. it looks better than to say "you need library x, package y, system z etc"
-
I don´t need it, too, but i think it would ease up the installation process a lot for new programmers. And besides that it´s nice to have a package which contains everything, so you can start immediately. it looks better than to say "you need library x, package y, system z etc"
I agree with this statement
-
One of our faculty members has created an installer with all the necessary components for our introductory students at the college.
I am sure that he will update the package as codeblocks is updated.
His link is here: http://www.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu/~goetz/codeblocks/
-
One of our faculty members has created an installer with all the necessary components for our introductory students at the college.
I am sure that he will update the package as codeblocks is updated.
His link is here: http://www.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu/~goetz/codeblocks/
That is an excellent tutorial, both for general usage and debugging.
Thanks
-
BCCISProf you can put few students to the CB project. There are always students who wants to do something useful :wink:.
-
I think the CB project should continue to offer with MinGW and without, it lowers the entry for new programmers. Who are struggling enough with the language and who don't need to be worrying about configuring build options. (granted the auto-detect is very nice)
-
Hello,
I've created an installer with NSIS (http://nsis.sourceforge.net/Main_Page) and HM NIS EDIT (http://hmne.sourceforge.net/). It includes the nightly CB_20061029_rev3157_win32 and the following MinGW (http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/mingw/?sort_by=date&sort=desc) packages:
- mingw-runtime-3.10.tar.gz
- mingw32-make-3.81-1.tar.gz
- gdb-6.3-2.exe
- binutils-2.17.50-20060824-1.tar.gz
- gcc-DW2-core-3.4.5-20060117-1.tar.gz
- gcc-DW2-g++-3.4.5-20060117-1.tar.gz
- mingw-utils-0.3.tar.gz
- w32api-3.7.tar.gz
It will install MinGW in C:\MinGW and allows you to choose where to install Code::Blocks. It also creates shortcuts to Code::Blocks and the Code::Blocks homepage.
http://rapidshare.de/files/37534194/CodeBlocks_with_MinGW_Setup.exe.html (http://rapidshare.de/files/37534194/CodeBlocks_with_MinGW_Setup.exe.html)
-
BCCISProf you can put few students to the CB project. There are always students who wants to do something useful :wink:.
I'm looking into it. I need to identify something that can be done by undergraduates, with limited experience, that is useful.
Perhaps, online documentation, or a translation into a language that you don't yet support.....
-
Can people open other topics for the discussions? it is very confusing to see the messages in this topic that has nothing to do with the RC3 release. it was only an announcement...
-
Any Chance the tutorial can be made into a Wiki? This would make it more accessible and updateable.