Code::Blocks Forums

User forums => Nightly builds => Topic started by: killerbot on September 29, 2016, 10:41:50 pm

Title: The 25 September 2016 build (10912) is out.
Post by: killerbot on September 29, 2016, 10:41:50 pm
Get quick announcements through the RSS feed http://www.codeblocks.org/nightly/CodeBlock_RSS.xml

Before you use a nightly make sure you understand how it works (http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,3232.0.html).

A link to the unicode windows wxWidget dll for Code::Blocks : http://sourceforge.net/projects/codeblocks/files/Binaries/Nightlies/Prerequisites/wxmsw28u_gcc_cb_wx2812_gcc510-TDM.7z

For those who might need this one (when no MingW installed on your system) : the mingw10m.dll : http://sourceforge.net/projects/codeblocks/files/Binaries/Nightlies/Prerequisites/mingwm10_gcc510-TDM.7z

The 25 September 2016 build is out.
  - Windows :
   http://sourceforge.net/projects/codeblocks/files/Binaries/Nightlies/2016/CB_20160925_rev10912_win32.7z
  - Linux :
   none

The current SDK version is : 1.30.0

Resolved Fixed:


Regressions/Confirmed/Annoying/Common bugs:


Title: Re: The 25 September 2016 build (10912) is out.
Post by: turbosnail on September 30, 2016, 08:34:18 am
SpellCheck !!! no working.

I think that to use this plugin in Russian is not a good idea. and besides, he eats resources and sometimes crash C :: B at start on wxWidgets3
Title: Re: The 25 September 2016 build (10912) is out.
Post by: oBFusCATed on September 30, 2016, 09:11:33 am
I think that to use this plugin in Russian is not a good idea.
The problem with Khram is that he doesn't want to cooperate with us, so we cannot fix his problem...

and besides, he eats resources and sometimes crash C :: B at start on wxWidgets3
Do you know how to reproduce the crashes?
And what do you mean by "he eats resources"?
Title: Re: The 25 September 2016 build (10912) is out.
Post by: ollydbg on October 01, 2016, 01:18:41 am
Hi, killerbot, It looks like the wx dll is still the old one, but we need a new one, see our discussion here:

Re: SVN build crashes when trying to editing/adding new compiler flags (http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,21207.msg145412.html#msg145412)

Thanks
Title: Re: The 25 September 2016 build (10912) is out.
Post by: trivia21 on October 03, 2016, 10:08:22 am
GCC, Linux.
Code
../../src/base/tinyxml/.libs/libtinyxml.a(tinywxuni.o): In function `wxThread::OnExit()':
/home/username/install/cb/trunk/src/base/tinyxml/tinywxuni.cpp:14: multiple definition of `TinyXML::LoadDocument(wxString const&, TiXmlDocument*)'
.libs/tinywxuni.o:/home/username/install/cb/trunk/src/sdk/tinywxuni.cpp:14: first defined here
../../src/base/tinyxml/.libs/libtinyxml.a(tinywxuni.o): In function `TinyXML::LoadDocument(wxString const&)':
/home/username/install/cb/trunk/src/base/tinyxml/tinywxuni.cpp:35: multiple definition of `TinyXML::LoadDocument(wxString const&)'
.libs/tinywxuni.o:/home/username/install/cb/trunk/src/sdk/tinywxuni.cpp:35: first defined here
../../src/base/tinyxml/.libs/libtinyxml.a(tinywxuni.o): In function `TinyXML::SaveDocument(wxString const&, TiXmlDocument*)':
/home/username/install/cb/trunk/src/base/tinyxml/tinywxuni.cpp:46: multiple definition of `TinyXML::SaveDocument(wxString const&, TiXmlDocument*)'
.libs/tinywxuni.o:/home/username/install/cb/trunk/src/sdk/tinywxuni.cpp:46: first defined here
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [libcodeblocks.la] Error 1
I'm using
Code
./configure --with-contrib-plugins=BrowseTracker,Cccc,CppCheck,codesnippets,codestat,Cscope,EditorTweaks,keybinder,smartindent,Valgrind --with-wx-config=/home/username/install/wxGTK-2.8.12/INSTALL/bin/wx-config --with-wx-prefix=/home/username/install/wxGTK-2.8.12/INSTALL --with-wx-exec-prefix=/home/username/install/wxGTK-2.8.12/INSTALL
Title: Re: The 25 September 2016 build (10912) is out.
Post by: oBFusCATed on October 03, 2016, 10:28:38 am
@trivia21: Is this a clean build?
Title: Re: The 25 September 2016 build (10912) is out.
Post by: trivia21 on October 03, 2016, 10:45:13 am
@trivia21: Is this a clean build?
Nope. I did a clean build now, it worked.
Title: Re: The 25 September 2016 build (10912) is out.
Post by: eckard_klotz on October 07, 2016, 05:25:14 am
Hello Everybody.

I had with the nightly before (The 21 June 2016 build (10868)) some heuristic behaviour based virus-detections again with Symantec Norton 630. Further investigations showed that this where "False Positive" detections.  Thus I decided to provide Symantec a zip-file with all 6 exe and 79 dll files of this nightly with the request to place them on their whitelist to prevent such detections for the current nightly.

They have accepted my request and yesterday I received the following reply:
Quote
Hello,

In relation to software whitelist submission 4003687.

We have added this version of the software to our whitelist.
Whitelisting is file specific. A new version of your software may have new files and thus new versions of the files would not be known to us. This could result in a false positive occurring on the new files.
In order to mitigate this risk, we recommend submitting new versions of your software to us.

Symantec's decision is not a certification or endorsement of your software in any way, and you are expressly advised by this message that Symantec does not consent to you disclosing that Symantec has added your software to its White-List, or that Symantec has evaluated, endorsed or certified your software in any manner, directly or indirectly.

Decisions made by Symantec are subject to change if alterations to the software are made over time or as classification criteria and/or the policy employed by Symantec changes over time to address the evolving landscape.

Please see our software whitelist program FAQ here: https://support.symantec.com/en_US/article.TECH232956.html

Sincerely,
Symantec Security Response
http://securityresponse.symantec.com

My first tests with the "File Insight" tool of Norton showed, that dll files detected as suspicious in the old release are now accepted as ok, even they are new and only less Norton users seem to use the new nightly (known by Symantec).

How ever, I hope that this nightly will not be detected by Symantec products any more and if so the mail posted here will be helpful while further discussions.

Best regards,
                    Eckard Klotz.
Title: Re: The 25 September 2016 build (10912) is out.
Post by: ascker on October 11, 2016, 10:59:53 am
Hello all,
I find CodeBlocks good IDE but I have problem with dpiaware, because my screen is 4K and the coding in CodeBlocks is not fun at all with 4K screen.

Using manifest file make the gui and icons okay but font and text is too old or not easy to read and recognise the colors.

Could I solve this problem with this version??????


Thank you...
Title: Re: The 25 September 2016 build (10912) is out.
Post by: oBFusCATed on October 11, 2016, 07:18:47 pm
No, CB is not dpiaware yet. Finders crossed that I'll buy myself a 4k monitor for Christmas. :)
Title: Re: The 25 September 2016 build (10912) is out.
Post by: ascker on October 12, 2016, 12:47:38 pm
Thanks for your replay.
Is there any plan in this year for dpiaware?
Title: Re: The 25 September 2016 build (10912) is out.
Post by: hairuoai on October 20, 2016, 03:34:45 am
seems the abbreviations funcition is not working ?
Title: Re: The 25 September 2016 build (10912) is out.
Post by: BlueHazzard on October 20, 2016, 09:40:06 pm
seems the abbreviations funcition is not working ?

any more information?
Title: Re: The 25 September 2016 build (10912) is out.
Post by: hairuoai on October 21, 2016, 07:23:55 am
seems the abbreviations funcition is not working ?

any more information?

for example , if i type "now"+ctrl+j,it should print the time .and this action didn't make any change ....
Title: Re: The 25 September 2016 build (10912) is out.
Post by: Jenna on October 21, 2016, 07:45:26 am
seems the abbreviations funcition is not working ?

any more information?

for example , if i type "now"+ctrl+j,it should print the time .and this action didn't make any change ....
Can you please check whether the menuentry "Edit-> Autocomplete" works and still has the "Ctrl+J" shortcut assigned ?
Title: Re: The 25 September 2016 build (10912) is out.
Post by: GbaLog on November 07, 2016, 02:06:06 pm
The initialization from C++11 doesn't work.
If I write:
std::string str{}; // with braces
If after that I writing str. , methods of this class does not displayed.
I observe this and in 16.01 and in this build.
Sorry for my English, it's don't my native language.
Title: Re: The 25 September 2016 build (10912) is out.
Post by: oBFusCATed on November 07, 2016, 10:18:57 pm
The initialization from C++11 doesn't work.
Have you switched to c++11 mode for your project? Have you installed c++11 enabled compiler? Does it work on the command line?
Title: Re: The 25 September 2016 build (10912) is out.
Post by: janissl on November 10, 2016, 09:48:00 am
SpellCheck !!! no working.

A spellcheck does not have any influence on code compilation, right? Then why bother developers with complaints about a non-core feature?

Therefore, my suggestion: For coding and compilation continue to use Code::Blocks, for presentation purposes - use a simple source code editor like Notepad++ or SciTE and make screenshots, export image files etc. from them if you need.

Otherwise, I cannot imagine the reason why a spellcheck functionality is so important or even mandatory for a developer.
Title: Re: The 25 September 2016 build (10912) is out.
Post by: GbaLog on November 10, 2016, 02:56:04 pm
The initialization from C++11 doesn't work.
Have you switched to c++11 mode for your project? Have you installed c++11 enabled compiler? Does it work on the command line?
It's not related with compiler. But for you - yes, i have c++11 compiler. This construction is compiled successfully, but I'm talking about the autocomplete. It's not possible for him.
Title: Re: The 25 September 2016 build (10912) is out.
Post by: ollydbg on November 10, 2016, 03:48:58 pm
I think this is the one reported several times in our bug system: Code::Blocks / Tickets / #391 Does not recognize C++11 uniform initializers (https://sourceforge.net/p/codeblocks/tickets/391/), right?
Title: Re: The 25 September 2016 build (10912) is out.
Post by: GbaLog on November 10, 2016, 08:37:33 pm
right?
Yes.
I see this on all pages in your link:
Code
labels: --> CodeCompletion
What does it mean?
I can anything do with this problem? If you can, explain more in detail, or give a link to an explanation.
Maybe I don't understand this, because my English to low. :(
Title: Re: The 25 September 2016 build (10912) is out.
Post by: oBFusCATed on November 10, 2016, 09:18:13 pm
Otherwise, I cannot imagine the reason why a spellcheck functionality is so important or even mandatory for a developer.
It saves time and embarrassment when someone else is reviewing your code.
Title: Re: The 25 September 2016 build (10912) is out.
Post by: ollydbg on November 11, 2016, 09:07:56 am
I see this on all pages in your link:
Code
labels: --> CodeCompletion
What does it mean?
It means this bug is belong to CodeCompletion plugin.

Quote
I can anything do with this problem? If you can, explain more in detail, or give a link to an explanation.
Maybe I don't understand this, because my English to low. :(
You can try to fix it by sending us patches.  :)
Title: Re: The 25 September 2016 build (10912) is out.
Post by: GbaLog on November 12, 2016, 10:28:59 am
Quote
You can try to fix it by sending us patches.  :)
My level in programming too low for this, sorry. But I hope, that any expert fix this soon.  :)
Title: Re: The 25 September 2016 build (10912) is out.
Post by: jeffsturmann on November 18, 2016, 05:57:05 pm
How do i make the code completion work in this version? I'm trying it with mingw64-gcc-6.1.0 and it doesn't work at all.
Title: Re: The 25 September 2016 build (10912) is out.
Post by: killerbot on February 28, 2017, 10:37:34 pm
An updated wx dll, to avoid the compiler optimization bug.


A link to the unicode windows wxWidget dll for Code::Blocks : http://sourceforge.net/projects/codeblocks/files/Binaries/Nightlies/Prerequisites/wxmsw28u_gcc_cb_wx2812_gcc510-TDM-2.7z

Note the '-2'.