Code::Blocks Forums

User forums => Nightly builds => Topic started by: killerbot on October 25, 2006, 08:07:52 pm

Title: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: killerbot on October 25, 2006, 08:07:52 pm
Get quick announcements through the RSS feed http://www.codeblocks.org/nightly/CodeBlock_RSS.xml

A link to the unicode windows wxWidget dll for Code::Blocks : http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/wxmsw26u_gcc_cb_wx2.6.3p2.7z

For those who might need this one (when no MingW installed on your system) : the mingw10m.dll : http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/mingwm10.7z

For support of ansi builds, a link to the ansi windows wxWidget dll for Code::Blocks : http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/wxmsw26_gcc_cb_wx2.6.3p2.7z

The 25 October 2006 build is out.
  - Windows : http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/CB_20061025_rev3145_win32.7z
  - Linux :
         http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/CB_20061025_rev3145_Ubuntu6.06.deb (not yet)
         http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/CB_20061025_rev3145_suse100+101.rpm
         http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/CB_20061025_rev3145_fc4+5.rpm


Resolved Fixed:


Regressions/Confirmed/Annoying/Common bugs:


Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: Acki on October 26, 2006, 02:55:46 am
If I start C::B I get this error message:
Code
some errors have been logged during 
the Code::Blocks startup process.

Please review them in the logs...
but no log file is created...
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: Pecan on October 26, 2006, 03:06:57 am
If I start C::B I get this error message:
Code
some errors have been logged during 
the Code::Blocks startup process.

Please review them in the logs...
but no log file is created...

The log is on the far left within the messages window (F2). Use the small arrow on the right to assure its visibility.


Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: dronT78 on October 26, 2006, 07:39:10 am
Compile errors
/usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0 undefined reference to 'DirectFBCreate'
etc...
why C::B needs libSDL?

AMD64 Gentoo 2006.1
DirectFB 0.9.25.1
libSDL 1.2.11

C::B build 3146
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: afb on October 26, 2006, 09:16:03 am
Code::Blocks is now starting to work again on the Mac,
after applying all of the latest wxFlatNotebook patches.

rev3146 should build cleanly using DarwinPorts/MacPorts,
and a "standalone" nightly build will follow later this week.

wiki: Installing_Code::Blocks_from_source_on_Mac_OS_X (http://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=Installing_Code::Blocks_from_source_on_Mac_OS_X)
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: afb on October 26, 2006, 09:18:05 am
why C::B needs libSDL?

I know that on some Unix platforms, wxWidgets uses SDL for sound support...
You might want to check if it is wx that links libSDL, and disable it if needed ?

wxWidgets configure:
Code
--without-sdl
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: takeshimiya on October 26, 2006, 09:28:43 am
Code::Blocks is now starting to work again on the Mac,
after applying all of the latest wxFlatNotebook patches.

rev3146 should build cleanly using DarwinPorts/MacPorts,
and a "standalone" nightly build will follow later this week.

wiki: Installing_Code::Blocks_from_source_on_Mac_OS_X (http://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=Installing_Code::Blocks_from_source_on_Mac_OS_X)

Has been solved the bug of running programs on Intel build?
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: afb on October 26, 2006, 10:29:16 am
Has been solved the bug of running programs on Intel build?

As far as I know, no... :-(

I was just happy to finally see tabs and some content again. :-)
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: afb on October 26, 2006, 10:43:12 am
Nope, first thing you do on Intel* still hangs Code::Blocks.
This includes: compiling a file, opening a project, etc. etc.

On the plus side, Code Completion seems to be working!
(at least it didn't hang, and even completed keywords...)

* Note that this only applies to the wxMac/Carbon version!
The wxGTK version does work fine on Intel Darwin / X11.

My suggestion is to use DarwinPorts and wxGTK for now,
if one want to use Code::Blocks rather than help debug it ?
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: ramguru on October 26, 2006, 11:15:54 am
I got some error report at starting: "ERROR: SDK version mismatch for CBProfiler (1.10.0). Expecting 1.11.2". And yeah my main CPP file was successfully cleared (0bytes) after trying to save it!! Guess if I'm going to use this IDE again  :?
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: killerbot on October 26, 2006, 01:07:28 pm
that is because thhose CBProfiler.dll/zip are no longer needed. Just remove them from the share directory  and plugin directory.

save returning to zero length, can you reproduce this ??
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: ramguru on October 26, 2006, 03:27:13 pm
...save returning to zero length, can you reproduce this ??

Yeah as many times as I wish. It's simple as that:
1. I open my recent project
2. I try to comment a few lines of code in my language (with some non ANSI characters)
3. I save my project
4. I get 0-length file

P.S. it seems only comments in my language cannot be saved (Lithuanian), comments in russian are acceptable
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: MortenMacFly on October 26, 2006, 03:43:59 pm
Yeah as many times as I wish. It's simple as that:
1. I open my recent project
2. I try to comment a few lines of code in my language (with some non ANSI characters)
3. I save my project
4. I get 0-length file
I could swear that you didn't enable the "right" format for non-ansi characters encoding, right? (Settings -> Editor -> General settings -> Default encoding). What do you expect to happen then?!
With regards Morten.
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: ramguru on October 26, 2006, 04:07:25 pm
OK when I set default encoding to UTF-8 and restart IDE, no more 0-length file saving. But you should not tell me that it's not a bug, just expected behaviour.
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: MortenMacFly on October 26, 2006, 06:12:58 pm
But you should not tell me that it's not a bug, just expected behaviour.
Ok- tell me an algorithm to read your mind what encoding (out of several dozen) you'd like to have for your files and I'll implement it.
With regards, Morten.
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: thomas on October 26, 2006, 06:44:18 pm
That's like stopping to use apache for http-server because in-development svn-version crashed, after you tried to mix some of it's sources with some older ones.
Lol, that's a quote I'll have to remember  :D
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: stahta01 on October 26, 2006, 07:05:02 pm
But you should not tell me that it's not a bug, just expected behaviour.
Ok- tell me an algorithm to read your mind what encoding (out of several dozen) you'd like to have for your files and I'll implement it.
With regards, Morten.

Morten:
Please share the code to implement the algorithm when you get it. I have needed this many times in the past but never found a good(or bad) implementation of the function readMind. I have been told it a short coming of mine that I can't read people minds. But, I was always afraid of garbage in / garbage out problem that would most likely happen with the function readMind. So, remember to support mind reading filters with your implementation.

Tim S
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: branleb on October 26, 2006, 07:20:58 pm
May it would help if you set the default encoding to UTF-8 or UTF-16/32 ??
If this is would be an error, please explain me why.


Shade37337->greetz()
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: stahta01 on October 26, 2006, 07:35:56 pm
May it would help if you set the default encoding to UTF-8 or UTF-16/32 ??
If this is would be an error, please explain me why.


Shade37337->greetz()

I would vote for the default of UTF-8. Window XP User thinking about using D as in gdc compiler.

Tim S
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: MortenMacFly on October 26, 2006, 07:40:56 pm
If this is would be an error, please explain me why.
This wouldn't really be an error, but the "default" is still ANSI somehow. I don't know compilers that have Unicode in their language syntax (not in comments). In addition Unicode is not backward compatible. So the question is: Can the compiler read this (not really the case for UTF-8 though...)? Anyway: I'd like to note two things:
- it can be setup in the options (which is of great help)
- we are already working on a concept/framework for an encoding detector... if what I have in mind will work it will even be "revolutionary"... ;-)

With regards, Morten.
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: MortenMacFly on October 26, 2006, 07:43:54 pm
Please share the code to implement the algorithm when you get it.
*lol* :lol:
BTW: For some people it is as simple as that:
Code
thoughts * readMind()
{
  return NULL;
}
Luckily they are not in our forum... ;-)
With regards, Morten.
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: ramguru on October 26, 2006, 07:45:42 pm
That's like stopping to use apache for http-server because in-development svn-version crashed, after you tried to mix some of it's sources with some older ones.
The greatest thing about this project is that it's based on custom edit control scintilla (best so far). Huh, not much left to implement. However, what I can least expect from such scintilla-based IDE are: good and handy docking system (well, you have one), superb file handling: saving & opening (these are "atom" operations to any text editor & simple to implement) the part that you failed to implement correctly. Any combination of encoding & input shouldn't lead to file-clearing that's why don't respect this project anymore!

MortenMacFly, you need more technical knowledge - any compiler CAN read UTF-8, because it's almost ANSI!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: MortenMacFly on October 26, 2006, 07:53:12 pm
MortenMacFly, you need more technical knowledge - any compiler CAN read UTF-8, because it's almost ANSI!!!!!!!!
Can the compiler read this (not really the case for UTF-8 though...)?
-no further comment-
With regards, Morten.
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: thomas on October 26, 2006, 07:55:31 pm
MortenMacFly, you need more technical knowledge - any compiler CAN read UTF-8, because it's almost ANSI!!!!!!!!
Let He Who Is Without Sin Cast The First Stone.
John 8:7

Your claim is only true for keywords and operators, but not for variable names or character constants, therefore not every compiler can read UTF-8.
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: bnilsson on October 26, 2006, 07:57:28 pm
Any news on a fix for the wxFNB tab problem for Mac?
No tabs on 3146 as far as I can see.
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: ramguru on October 26, 2006, 08:00:11 pm
sorry MortenMacFly missed a few words in your vague statement....
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: afb on October 26, 2006, 08:07:53 pm
Any news on a fix for the wxFNB tab problem for Mac?
No tabs on 3146 as far as I can see.

You need to apply the patch, from wxFlatNotebook's SF project page.

Packaged for C::B here, posted the link on the Wiki page earlier:
http://www.algonet.se/~afb/wx/codeblocks-wxflatnotebook.patch

There is a redraw/refresh bug now, but it seems to mostly be
affecting the contents - the actual tabs should show up OK ?
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: mandrav on October 26, 2006, 08:22:08 pm
However, what I can least expect from such scintilla-based IDE are: good and handy docking system (well, you have one), superb file handling: saving & opening (these are "atom" operations to any text editor & simple to implement) the part that you failed to implement correctly. Any combination of encoding & input shouldn't lead to file-clearing that's why don't respect this project anymore!

Thanks for helping us (idiots) out then.
Oh, and thanks for your kind words...

Bye-bye now and go have fun elsewhere.
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: ramguru on October 26, 2006, 08:27:21 pm

Thanks for helping us (idiots) out then.
Oh, and thanks for your kind words...

Bye-bye now and go have fun elsewhere.
After posting such reply you really look like one...no offence
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: BCCISProf on October 26, 2006, 08:55:24 pm
Not that Mandrav and the rest of the Codeblocks development team need my defense, but let me state that I have found the team to be extremely responsive  and very helpful when I (and others) have had any questions or comments.

Codeblocks is an excellent system and we are recommending it to students at our college for use as their development environment.

Good work and I (we) all look forward to its continued enhancement.
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: mandrav on October 26, 2006, 09:28:42 pm
Quote from: ramguru
Guess if I'm going to use this IDE again
Quote from: ramguru
you failed to implement correctly.
Quote from: ramguru
don't respect this project anymore!
Quote from: ramguru
MortenMacFly, you need more technical knowledge

Quote from: ramguru
After posting such reply you really look like one [idiot] ...no offence

All of the above quotes are from this same topic, in just one day: today. The same day you registered here.
Did you come here just to troll?
Do you really think you 're getting anyone's respect here with this attitude?
Do you think you have the right to come here and insult us like this?
No mate, you are not granted such a right. If you don't like our project, fine. Leave and never come back. If you do like it, stay and give constructive criticism, not insults.

The community here has always been helpful and kind. If you can't go along with this, then you 're not welcomed here.

Just one more post from you with such an attitude towards the dev team, and you will be banned. Whether you like it or not.
Note that you 're the very first person I have to tell this after three years of running this project. This should give you a hint...
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: ramguru on October 26, 2006, 09:49:15 pm
Congratulation for efficiently faking my post (last quote) that's now almost worth ban...isn't that what you want, ban everyone saying TRUTH loudly. YOU (CB team) neither was helpful nor willing to solve the problem. I hope these students (BCCISProf are talking about) are ready to loose their intellectual property...
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: stahta01 on October 26, 2006, 09:51:48 pm
..., you need more technical knowledge - any compiler CAN read UTF-8, because it's almost ANSI!!!!!!!!

You do know that UTF-8 is NOT ANSI, I think it is a ISO/IEC standard and a standard Internet protocol; and it is coincident with ASCII (7 bit ASCII, note there is NO 8 bit ASCII standard to my knowledge.).

Edit: While ASCII is valid UTF-8; UTF-8 is not always valid ASCII. An alias for ASCII is ANSI_X3.4-1968, but I think you meant to use ASCII which is a standard instead of ANSI which is a group that sets standards.

Tim S
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: mandrav on October 26, 2006, 09:58:47 pm
Quote
YOU (CB team) neither was helpful nor willing to solve the problem.

Helpful or willing for what? This?

Quote
Guess if I'm going to use this IDE again

In case you haven't noticed, this is an open-source project. We work on it on our own spare time and give it out for free. We don't want you to pay us money or anything. Actually we want nothing in return. A little respect is all we need, nothing else. You failed to provide it in your very first post (and all the rest too).

When encountering a bug, your options are (a) fix it yourself or (b) provide info to the developers so that they can take a look and fix it when they can. You 've failed to do both...


Quote
Congratulation for efficiently faking my post (last quote)

So, explain it to me then because I see you have put the word "idiots" in bold (where I didn't in my original post), making it to stand out.


Thanks for helping us (idiots) out then.
Oh, and thanks for your kind words...

Bye-bye now and go have fun elsewhere.
After posting such reply you really look like one...no offence

And please be precise on what exactly I look like. And I reserve my right to be offended.


Quote
I hope these students (BCCISProf are talking about) are ready to loose their intellectual property...

LOL! Where did this come from? :lol:
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: killerbot on October 26, 2006, 10:01:09 pm
Congratulation for efficiently faking my post (last quote) that's now almost worth ban...isn't that what you want, ban everyone saying TRUTH loudly. YOU (CB team) neither was helpful nor willing to solve the problem. I hope these students (BCCISProf are talking about) are ready to loose their intellectual property...


man, stop bitching. There are some encoding problems. They are not solved yet, we do hope to solve them, that's just common sense. Not much is explained, some things are somewhere in this forum about this specific problem.  We don't have a manual *yet*, so we can't explain or warn users *yet*. This project is in development, it is not finished. You don't need to use our nightlies or build it yourself. Just wait till the product is finished if you want full security. If you don't want the security you are invited to have a peek on what's coming and helping out on this wonderful project. Then just analyze what went wrong, provide constructive feedback and the day we are going to tackle that issue and hopefully fix it, then we can use your valuable feedback.
Now we are just loosing everyone's time : ours, yours, the community reading this kind of "shit flames".

So I politely ask you : help and grow with us, but don't be afraid to get burned from time to time (every commit of code might be a risk) or get out, find another IDE which suits best your requirements and bully someone else. Take it or leave it.
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: rjmyst3 on October 26, 2006, 10:11:29 pm
In the meantime, perhaps when the wxWidgets encoding conversion routines return an empty string it could be caught and a warning could be shown to the user, such that the file is not lost.
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: stahta01 on October 26, 2006, 10:25:04 pm
I think the right solution is most likely to set the default at the time of installation by asking the user. But, to me this is NOT a major issue. It is also NOT an issue to be decided at this time. I think it is an issue that should be decided before the final release candidate is done. And, it might make sense for each OS to have a different default if the user does NOT pick something.  I have already voted for an UTF-8 default, but I have no idea of the down side of that default. I have set my CB to UTF-8 today to see what happens. But, I really don't use it enough to be a good test case of whether it is a valid choice.

Tim S
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: killerbot on October 26, 2006, 10:29:27 pm
I think for compilers etc, we will see, by trying it out, like you do.
I do think we should avoid to have a BOM in there.
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: mandrav on October 26, 2006, 10:42:15 pm
Quote
And, it might make sense for each OS to have a different default if the user does NOT pick something.

You should be aware that C::B is not setting any defaults. Instead, the current system encoding is set as default. If your operating system is badly configured, then C::B's "default" encoding will be badly configured too.
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: MortenMacFly on October 26, 2006, 11:15:35 pm
Revision 3148 will take care of this issue in an appropriate way.
<sarcasm>Thanks for the patch, ramguru.</sarcasm> :lol: :lol:
In the meantime, perhaps when the wxWidgets encoding conversion routines return an empty string it could be caught and a warning could be shown to the user, such that the file is not lost.
rjmyst3: Thanks for being productive.
With regards, Morten.
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: killerbot on October 26, 2006, 11:22:54 pm
good job Morton,

now Mr ramguru, since you know what to type to reproduce the bug, could you also try out the patch to see if works and warns you that things are gonna go bogus, and then try out to change the encoding and try to save again.

Patiently awaiting your test report. Many thanks in advance.

Note : after your raging bull (shit) there's already some effort on it within a few hours.
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: Game_Ender on October 27, 2006, 01:26:13 am
Note : after your raging bull (shit) there's already some effort on it within a few hours.

I think that should read "even after", not "after".  I think its a good display that even after some harsh words were said the issue still got patched, desipite that attitude of the user.

This is an alpha product, with no warranty, made by volunteers, and released for free.  In my book you can't bitch to much about a project no working when it doesn't have these things.

A final word on UTF-8 and ASCII:  Files and strings which contain only 7-bit ASCII characters have the same encoding under both ASCII and UTF-8.  So any ASCII encoded file can automatically be read as a UTF-8 file.  Paraphrased from here (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/unicode.html#utf-8).
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: Jewe on October 27, 2006, 01:19:15 pm
This must be the longest post in the nightly build part...
and with only so few problem and a lot of fighting....
I do not mind but the result is... no nightly for the 26st...

cheers,

Jewe

btw, love using C::B
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: branleb on October 27, 2006, 04:59:04 pm
...
I do think we should avoid to have a BOM in there.
I think that too, because the compiler will report an error if he don't
understands Unicode/UTF-8 and a BOM character is present.

But does really NO compilers supports Unicode?
if that's true (I believe you tell the truth), that's a poor situation.

For the encoding-detector:

how would you make a difference (and detect the encoding)
Code
0x13 0x65
could be interpreted as '\r'+'a' (= "\ra") or as the char U+1365

Shade37337->greetz();

Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: Phatency on October 27, 2006, 05:26:13 pm
That's like stopping to use apache for http-server because in-development svn-version crashed, after you tried to mix some of it's sources with some older ones.
Lol, that's a quote I'll have to remember  :D
Thought I deleted that post, as I realized the reason he stopped using cb was because of the 0-byte file, not the old CBProfiler :e
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: StateS on October 27, 2006, 11:08:24 pm
Contrary to what others may think *hint* *hint* I think that this IDE is the best I have seen for a wxWidgets + C/C++ developer, the evolution that this IDE has had from version 1.0 RC2 to these new nightly builds is just phenomenal. Keep up the great work guys, and please don't pay attention to people like ramguru, they're not worth your time.

[EDIT]: BTW... no October 27 build?
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: MortenMacFly on October 27, 2006, 11:53:28 pm
But does really NO compilers supports Unicode?
Maybe I missed that post but I believe nobody said this. New compilers do (and they really should do). I think what was meant was to ensure backward compatibility with old (legacy) compilers - and they usually won't.
With regards, Morten.
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: thomas on October 28, 2006, 01:15:37 pm
But does really NO compilers supports Unicode?
If Unicode is supposed to mean UTF-8, most of them certainly do. It is even the default encoding that gcc expects if you don't tell it otherwise.

The original claim was different, though. The statement was "you need more technical knowledge, all compilers support Unicode", and this is not true as such.
To give an example of a modern (and otherwise very good) compiler that does not support Unicode: TinyCC. Other examples would be older versions of VC or Borland compilers.

It does not matter what compilers understand, however. Code::Blocks cannot just boldly use UTF-8 for everything. What Code::Blocks does right now is to use the system's default. It is not perfect, but it is something that is 100% automatic and that usually works (unless you edit sources coming from someone with a different encoding, which would require an encoding detector to work properly).

Of course the "use system default" approach utterly fails both for people who are too stupid to set up their system correctly and for people who run a pirated localised version of Windows that has an encoding not compatible with their native language. But seriously, should this be a concern to us?  :lol:
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: ramguru on October 28, 2006, 02:32:36 pm
I do not mind but the result is... no nightly for the 26st...

Yep, I became the cause of your all problems including somebody's laziness. I must raise thumbs-up to killerbot for at least doing something & other guy for suggesting solution... (that warning message really does the job - warns; & total destruction (no *.bak is made) of your code can be avoided).

Of course the "use system default" approach utterly fails both for people who are too stupid to set up their system correctly and for people who run a pirated localised version of Windows that has an encoding not compatible with their native language. But seriously, should this be a concern to us?  :lol:
As I suspect this is aimed at me...well bro you're unforgivably wrong - I own genuine Windows XP professional edition, do you? And I'm not stupid: I was just new to your IDE, and as new user imagined that the system is friendly to new users (the mistake I made).
BTW it's funny - I tried to play with encodings...and I've found another expected behaviour: when one enc. is set as default and you open file in another, you see empty window...it compiles with no problems though
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: nix_BB on October 28, 2006, 05:51:59 pm
Yep, I became the cause of your all problems including somebody's laziness.

I would not call any one of the regular C::B contributors lazy... dedicated- certainly! ...overworked- continuously! ...unappreciated- only by the likes of you it seems... Please respect the enormous amount of work these guys are doing for FREE.

Thanks to your input a deadly oversight has been rectified- you've made a positive difference- don't force the admins hand by continuing your poor approach to addressing the community.

No one appreciates the tone of your posts, but positive feedback is always welcomed. (An opinion based on my own experiences with the developers of this essential project.)

Shape up or ship out, but I'd prefer to see the community grow and benefit from your input.

-Nix
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: DarkHorizon on October 29, 2006, 03:50:19 am
As I suspect this is aimed at me...well bro you're unforgivably wrong - I own genuine Windows XP professional edition, do you?

This is laughable. Thanks for providing a thoroughly entertaining thread. Search google images for "arguing on the internet". Please.

And thanks again to the C::B dev team for providing a solid development platform, without which my own project would be sorely under-developed.
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: MortenMacFly on October 29, 2006, 09:25:08 am
Yep, I became the cause of your all problems including somebody's laziness. I must raise thumbs-up to killerbot for at least doing something & other guy for suggesting solution... (that warning message really does the job - warns; & total destruction (no *.bak is made) of your code can be avoided).
I have to disappoint you: It was me - your lazy idiot without knowledge that fixed this bug. It took me 5 minutes to track down and fix the issue... I was just waiting to see if you could provide a patch, too as I feel that you are the expert here.
With regards, Morten.
Title: Re: The 25 october 2006 build is out.
Post by: lubos on October 29, 2006, 10:39:59 am
this will never stop, ban him