It's now official :)
Head over to the downloads (http://www.codeblocks.org/downloads) section to get it!
The debian source archive does not contain additional or special stuff that is not in svn (except for the docs subdirectory).It's now official :)
Head over to the downloads (http://www.codeblocks.org/downloads) section to get it!
Can we get also a plain (non-debian) source archive? it's not optimal for other distros to base their packages on the debian source archive containing additional stuff. And I think the EN and DE docs should be packaged separately too.
Can we get also a plain (non-debian) source archive? it's not optimal for other distros to base their packages on the debian source archive containing additional stuff. And I think the EN and DE docs should be packaged separately too.
svn checkout svn://svn.berlios.de/codeblocks/tags/10.05 codeblocks-10.05
cd codeblocks-10.05
sed -e 's/8.02/10.05/g' -i.orig update_revision.sh
sed -e 's/\/\/\(#define RELEASE "10.05"\)/\1/' -i.orig src/src/appglobals.h
./bootstrap && ./configure
make dist
But the real source tarball (codeblocks_10.05-1.tar.gz) is inside another tarball (codeblocks-10.05-1debian-src.tar.bz2) and that complicates the unpacking and verifying a bit.The debian source archive does not contain additional or special stuff that is not in svn (except for the docs subdirectory).It's now official :)
Head over to the downloads (http://www.codeblocks.org/downloads) section to get it!
Can we get also a plain (non-debian) source archive? it's not optimal for other distros to base their packages on the debian source archive containing additional stuff. And I think the EN and DE docs should be packaged separately too.
Can we get also a plain (non-debian) source archive? it's not optimal for other distros to base their packages on the debian source archive containing additional stuff. And I think the EN and DE docs should be packaged separately too.
You can use SVN (http://www.codeblocks.org/downloads/7) and a dist snapshot meanwhile,
until the source tarball download has been fixed...Codesvn checkout svn://svn.berlios.de/codeblocks/tags/10.05 codeblocks-10.05
cd codeblocks-10.05
sed -e 's/8.02/10.05/g' -i.orig update_revision.sh
sed -e 's/\/\/\(#define RELEASE "10.05"\)/\1/' -i.orig src/src/appglobals.h
./bootstrap && ./configure
make dist
Should make a codeblocks-10.05svn6285.tar.bz2
(which is the same as r6282, only tagged "10.05").
SF.net needs updated; still has 8.02 release as the most current.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/codeblocks/files/
It's now official :)
Head over to the downloads (http://www.codeblocks.org/downloads) section to get it!
Many thanks to all the developers who worked so hard for this!
luke@Argon:~$ codeblocks
codeblocks: relocation error: /usr/lib/libcodeblocks.so.0: symbol _Z18wxSafeConvertWX2MBPKw, version WXU_2.8.2 not defined in file libwx_baseu-2.8.so.0 with link time reference
Just thought I'd let you know that the 10.05 deb packages don't work on Ubuntu 10.04 with the default wxWidgets (e.g. without the wx repository):Ubuntu comes with 2.8.10 and the packages are compiled with 2.8.10 (from apt.wxwidgets.org), but the binaries shipped by ubuntu are not compatible with the binaries provided by apt.wxwidgets.org.Codeluke@Argon:~$ codeblocks
codeblocks: relocation error: /usr/lib/libcodeblocks.so.0: symbol _Z18wxSafeConvertWX2MBPKw, version WXU_2.8.2 not defined in file libwx_baseu-2.8.so.0 with link time reference
I think because the deb packages were compiled with wx 2.8.2 and Ubuntu 10.04 comes with 2.8.0. I don't suppose it's possible to get some packages compiled for vanilla 10.04? Especially as it's an LTS release, it would make it a lot easier for people to try Codeblocks.
NOTE: The Debian packages have been linked against wxGTK-2.8.10 from apt.wxwidgets.org (lenny-wx).To successfully install these packages, you have to add the wxWidgets repository for your distribution in your /etc/apt/sources.list (e.g. deb http://apt.wxwidgets.org/ lenny-wx main). Besides Debian lenny, apt.wxwidgets.org also supports all Ubuntu distributions: dapper, edgy, etch, feisty, gutsy, hardy, interpid, jaunty, karmic and lucid.
The packages are known to work on ubuntu too. You have to use the appropriate wxwidgets-packages in this case, see here (http://wiki.wxpython.org/InstallingOnUbuntuOrDebian) for details.
If you want to use my packages on ubuntu 9.10 (karmic koala) or newer you have to use the aprpriate packages provided by http://apt.wxwidgets.org (http://apt.wxwidgets.org) , because the wx2.8.10 packages from ubuntu are not compatible with the packages from http://apt.wxwidgets.org (http://apt.wxwidgets.org). You should be able to use the new wxWidgets 2.8.11 packages without problems.
There exists also a repository containing packages for ubuntu, maintained by pasgui, see here (http://lgp203.free.fr/spip/spip.php?article1) how to use it.
Why was the Help plugin not included?It *is* included, hence you probably forgot to enable in during installation. BTW: Mentioning the platform would be extremely useful.
but i am using windows 7 so which 1 should i download?I think the windows-installer should do it (even if win7 is not listed explicitely).
Just thought I'd let you know that the 10.05 deb packages don't work on Ubuntu 10.04 with the default wxWidgets (e.g. without the wx repository):Ubuntu comes with 2.8.10 and the packages are compiled with 2.8.10 (from apt.wxwidgets.org), but the binaries shipped by ubuntu are not compatible with the binaries provided by apt.wxwidgets.org.Codeluke@Argon:~$ codeblocks
codeblocks: relocation error: /usr/lib/libcodeblocks.so.0: symbol _Z18wxSafeConvertWX2MBPKw, version WXU_2.8.2 not defined in file libwx_baseu-2.8.so.0 with link time reference
I think because the deb packages were compiled with wx 2.8.2 and Ubuntu 10.04 comes with 2.8.0. I don't suppose it's possible to get some packages compiled for vanilla 10.04? Especially as it's an LTS release, it would make it a lot easier for people to try Codeblocks.
EDIT:
and you should know about that issue:
http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,12098.msg82401.html#msg82401 (http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,12098.msg82401.html#msg82401) and following.
This can not be fixed with packages for debian.
I could compile ubuntu-packages also, but there is already a repo for ubuntu that works as far as I know.
Is there any page describing what's new in this release? Like changelog, release notes or something?not afaik, theres the logs in the nightlies ofc.. as well as in the svn/git i guess
It's a pity. I'd love to know what I can expect before I upgrade my C::B. And I believe I'm not alone. I don't consider possible to search all the logs for two years back.Is there any page describing what's new in this release? Like changelog, release notes or something?not afaik, theres the logs in the nightlies ofc.. as well as in the svn/git i guess
It's a pity. I'd love to know what I can expect before I upgrade my C::B. And I believe I'm not alone. I don't consider possible to search all the logs for two years back.
Writing short news about new versions of free software (for OSS servers) is harder this way too...
Can I ask someone to upload the pure source package to the download site?What about:
What about:this is not listed here: http://www.codeblocks.org/downloads/25
http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/codeblocks-10.05-0.fc13.src.rpm
http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/codeblocks-10.05-1debian-src.tar.bz2
???
(2010-06-07 16:38:55) Aldaron: Anyway, I was mutilating the slackware build script for the new version. And EVERYTHING was changed after the last version..
(2010-06-07 16:41:13) Aldaron: Details: it makes no sense that the only source release version is "10.05-1debian". That's ugly, also it doesn't even uncompress to a dir with the same version, but to a dir called "src/". Inside is another source package with another version, which uncompresses to a dir with a third version tag.
(2010-06-07 16:43:47) Aldaron: Additionally, gz -> bz2, except the inner package.
(2010-06-07 16:44:24) Aldaron: I already forgot if there was something else, but making a script to automatically build and package the software is right now as hard as it gets
(2010-06-07 16:44:54) Aldaron: except for the fact that Code::Blocks itself compiles nicely, but that's because the code is good quality
(2010-06-07 16:46:28) Aldaron: so, please put some sensible version tag to the zip file and have it decompress to a dir with the *same* version (and software name), and it's much easier for everyone
(2010-06-07 20:02:26) obfuscated: Aldaron: if you have the svn tree checked out, you can do make dist and you'll have a source tarball
(2010-06-07 20:12:54) Aldaron: obfuscated: yea, I did find that out.
(2010-06-07 20:13:44) Aldaron: but I don't think it makes sense to make all users of all non-debian distros to do that
(2010-06-07 20:15:03) Aldaron: right now it seems that source only works for debian (okay, it's not debian-specific, but it kinda claims to be)
Ubuntu 10.04
first of all, very appreciate your efforts in improving this IDE for us.
codeblocks 8.02 puts compiler settings under build option, that is a convenient way as compiler's debug/release mode can be set up directly under build option. but in version 10.05 compiler settings is moved to "global" settings.
I hope I find the time to create a clean (non-debian and without the docs I added for debian) source tar-ball tomorrow.Here it is:
If I have uploaded it to berlios I post it here.
http://www.codeblocks.org/downloads/26for details.
Code::Blocks works fine under Windows 98 / ME. A german interface will be nice.I think the debugger won't work correctly on pre XP windows, not possible to fix it....
awesome!C::B itself is "only" 23.3 MB, the 70 MB installer includes MinGW.
why is the installer 70 MB (i think it was about 15 MB before)? just curious.
C::B itself is "only" 23.3 MB, the 70 MB installer includes MinGW.
Hi! I cannot download the latest codeblocks release as a debian package from berilos. Is there any mirrors on other sites?You can download the release or nightly packages from my repo.
please answer the question: where can I download code::blocks 10.5 binaries for Windows (berliOS server doesn't work)You can use
I want to let you know that I was unable to download the debian 64-bit from sourceforge. I was expecting an 18.8M file but only get a 3.3M corrupted file.Thank you for pointing this out. I have re-uploaded that file, which should hopefully be complete now.
is there a reason why releases are so far in between?Hi,
Are there any important non-svn-contrib plugins in the wild?I think the spell check plugin is quite important. :D
Are there any important non-svn-contrib plugins in the wild?How can you know? I know at least about two closed source plugins which have such dependencies. I bet there are more.
Around 2 years since the last stable release. Still no Stable release :(Current nightlies are stable. Way more stable and feature-rich than 10/05.
When will the next stable version will be released... I'm waiting to see some feature to override all other IDE's and I really love Code::Blocks... thanx to developers..I am waiting for some developments on the IDE, too. It's good, but can be better. The error tracing is satisfactory either, but it again has to be improved. Code::Blocks rocks overall. I am new of using it, and I'm lovin' it. ::)
See the nightly builds forum: http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/board,20.0.html (http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/board,20.0.html)When will the next stable version will be released... I'm waiting to see some feature to override all other IDE's and I really love Code::Blocks... thanx to developers..I am waiting for some developments on the IDE, too. It's good, but can be better. The error tracing is satisfactory either, but it again has to be improved. Code::Blocks rocks overall. I am new of using it, and I'm lovin' it. ::)
Hey,Do not post the same question three times please.
Just downloaded windows 8 and now my compiler does not work anymore.
GNU GCC Compiler is what I have. And using the newest version so 10.05 or whatever.
Does anyone know why this is happening??
Thanks