Code::Blocks Forums

User forums => General (but related to Code::Blocks) => Topic started by: sls on February 04, 2007, 11:14:38 pm

Title: Could we have the old Symbols viewer back please?
Post by: sls on February 04, 2007, 11:14:38 pm
Heya. Take a look at this screenshot: http://www.codeblocks.org/img/screenshots/win_full.png (http://www.codeblocks.org/img/screenshots/win_full.png)

Now, I don't know about you, but I much prefer that way of viewing symbols to what is currently in what I have (build 3565). I like to be able to see the entire contents of the project in one box. Is there a way to bring this "ClassView"-like interface back? I couldn't find any setting in the options window.

n.b. Treat me gently; I don't know a lot about the development of development programs.

Thanks!
SLS
Title: Re: Could we have the old Symbols viewer back please?
Post by: manianis on February 04, 2007, 11:33:34 pm
Yes that's true... Yes the older Symbol viewer is more usefull than this one which views some methods twice I don't know why ?
Title: Re: Could we have the old Symbols viewer back please?
Post by: manianis on February 04, 2007, 11:41:37 pm
Another request please... Is there a mean to have the methods come first and the member vars comes after them... It's more practical...  :(
Title: Re: Could we have the old Symbols viewer back please?
Post by: sls on February 18, 2007, 10:34:02 pm
bump (Sorry, but my question wasn't answered)
Title: Re: Could we have the old Symbols viewer back please?
Post by: raph on February 20, 2007, 08:34:41 pm
Quote from: sls on February 04, 2007, 11:14:38 pm
I like to be able to see the entire contents of the project in one box.
Signed.
Quote from: manianis on February 04, 2007, 11:33:34 pm
Yes the older Symbol viewer is more usefull than this one which views some methods twice I don't know why ?
If you are writing
Code
void foo(const char*);
void foo(const char* str) { ... }
it'll be recognized as two symbols.

Quote from: manianis on February 04, 2007, 11:41:37 pm
Another request please... Is there a mean to have the methods come first and the member vars comes after them... It's more practical...  :(
Signed, too :D.