Hi everybody,
I've installed C::B from pacman and all its requirements. But as said in the title, while configurating the options the Toolbar icon size options doesn't show small icons. It shows 16x16 as Normal ones, but no option for smalls. The icons in the toolbar look very big, and this is annoying to me. Is there any possibility to fix it and have smaller icons?
This is happening to me in Archlinux. I've installed C::B (an older version, 16.* from Ubuntu repo and the icons size is olay)
Information:
Name : Code::Blocks
Version : 20.03-r11997
SDK Version : 2.0.0
Scintilla Version: 3.7.5
Author : The Code::Blocks Team
E-mail : info@codeblocks.org
Website : http://www.codeblocks.org
wxWidgets Library (wxGTK port)
Version 3.0.5 (Unicode: wchar_t, debug level: 1),
compiled at May 10 2020 07:34:55
Runtime version of toolkit used is 3.24.
Compile-time GTK+ version is 3.24.20.
Also, here you have a link to some screenshots from my problem.
https://imgur.com/a/zLgfy4L
If you need some more information, I'll provide it. I would like to solve that problem, it is nothing important, but annoys me.
Thanks in advance!
Hi,
First of all, thanks for your help.
What happens if you make the Code-completion toolbar floating or if you hide it?
The padding around the images is still present. It doesnt matter which of the toolbars are showed.
What is the DPI of you monitor and/or the scaling factor you're using?
xdpyinfo | grep -B 2 resolution
screen #0:
dimensions: 1366x768 pixels (361x203 millimeters)
resolution: 96x96 dots per inch
For what I read this could be scaling factor 1. I'm not using any DE, I use i3wm.
I dont know how to find exactly what monitor model my laptop has, because I think it was changed prior I bought it, It is an x220, but I think it has some mod in the display, because this display has more panoramic vision than others x220 I had. If you know how can I find that info, please tell me.
I've also tried changing my dpi resolution (increasing it) but the padding scales also. As you have pointed, the problem could be the padding, as the icon size is correct, I didnt notice about that.
Any ideas?
Thanks for the help.