Build for Ubuntu 6.10/7.04 i386 can be found here (http://lgp203.free.fr/spip/spip.php?article1)
morphius@azmael:~$ sudo apt-get install libcodeblocks0 codeblocks libwxsmithlib0 codeblocks-contrib
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
E: Couldn't find package libcodeblocks0
morphius@azmael:~$
Build for Ubuntu 6.10/7.04 i386 can be found here (http://lgp203.free.fr/spip/spip.php?article1)
When I do the `sudo apt-get install libcodeblocks0 codeblocks libwxsmithlib0 codeblocks-contrib` I get:Codemorphius@azmael:~$ sudo apt-get install libcodeblocks0 codeblocks libwxsmithlib0 codeblocks-contrib
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
E: Couldn't find package libcodeblocks0
morphius@azmael:~$
I've got the deb http://lgp203.free.fr/ubuntu/ feisty main line in my /etc/apt/sources.list file.
Build for Ubuntu 6.10/7.04 i386 can be found here (http://lgp203.free.fr/spip/spip.php?article1)
When I do the `sudo apt-get install libcodeblocks0 codeblocks libwxsmithlib0 codeblocks-contrib` I get:Codemorphius@azmael:~$ sudo apt-get install libcodeblocks0 codeblocks libwxsmithlib0 codeblocks-contrib
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
E: Couldn't find package libcodeblocks0
morphius@azmael:~$
I've got the deb http://lgp203.free.fr/ubuntu/ feisty main line in my /etc/apt/sources.list file.
Could you try again because I was updating the repository.
BR
pasgui
codeblocks: /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_aui-2.8.so.0: version `WXU_2.8.5' not found (required by codeblocks)
sudo apt-get install libcodeblocks0=1.0svn4413 codeblocks=1.0svn4413 libwxsmithlib0=1.0svn4413 codeblocks-contrib=1.0svn4413
Hi all,
I updated my codeblocks version with the Ubuntu repository and now I have the following message:CodeIs that normal?codeblocks: /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_aui-2.8.so.0: version `WXU_2.8.5' not found (required by codeblocks)
Thanks for your work
EDIT: it could be nice to have a solution quite quickly because I am using codeblocks for my work and currently I am... at work ;'( and I cannot work! ;'(
EDIT: packages for Ubuntu are not available at Berlios, they cannot be found.
EDIT: I found a temporary solution in the pages about the release 4418, which is to downgrade to 4413 waiting for another solution...Codesudo apt-get install libcodeblocks0=1.0svn4413 codeblocks=1.0svn4413 libwxsmithlib0=1.0svn4413 codeblocks-contrib=1.0svn4413
Hi,
The ubuntu package in LGP are compiled with the alternative repository (thanks dje to remember). See http://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=Installing_Code::Blocks_nightly_build_on_Ubuntu (http://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=Installing_Code::Blocks_nightly_build_on_Ubuntu).
CB team: which repository is used to compile the package provided on Berlios ?
Best regards,
pasgui
I use the "deb http://apt.tt-solutions.com/ubuntu/ edgy main" repository to build the Berlios packages. From what I read into things from the wxWidgets website, that repo contains the "stable" packages and the wxwigets.org repo packages are more "beta". And unless I'm mistaken, it shouldn't make any difference that I build my packages with tt-solutions and someone uses wxwidgets.org to run CB. Unless something has changed recently.
codeblocks: /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_aui-2.8.so.0: version `WXU_2.8.5' not found (required by codeblocks)
if all the tools are manually removed from default.confWhat makes you think you are supposed to edit that file?
if all the tools are manually removed from default.confWhat makes you think you are supposed to edit that file?
if all the tools are manually removed from default.confWhat makes you think you are supposed to edit that file?
interesting question. makes me wonder why xml is used at all if the files aren't robust to hand editing.
Makes me wonder why people seem to have a compulsory need to edit any file that contains xml. If it was a binary file, would you be urged to fire up the hex editor in the same way?interesting question. makes me wonder why xml is used at all if the files aren't robust to hand editing.if all the tools are manually removed from default.confWhat makes you think you are supposed to edit that file?
Hi, do anybody use Win XP 64bit edition with C::B? I do and I'm not able to debug any C::B projects, because the debbuger stops immediatelly with message 'Debugger finished with status 0' without any effects. Is it only my problem or is it a bug (of CB or GDB itself)? I use DBG 6.3 donwnloaded from MinGW site.Make sure you have "generate debugging symbols" enabled and you do not have "strip executable" turned on.
QuoteHi, do anybody use Win XP 64bit edition with C::B? I do and I'm not able to debug any C::B projects, because the debbuger stops immediatelly with message 'Debugger finished with status 0' without any effects. Is it only my problem or is it a bug (of CB or GDB itself)? I use DBG 6.3 donwnloaded from MinGW site.Make sure you have "generate debugging symbols" enabled and you do not have "strip executable" turned on.
What can I do for this problem?Search the forum and pick one of the 1 mio solutions.
Hmm... unluckily don't have a 64-bit Windows to test, could only guess :(QuoteQuoteHi, do anybody use Win XP 64bit edition with C::B? I do and I'm not able to debug any C::B projects, because the debbuger stops immediatelly with message 'Debugger finished with status 0' without any effects. Is it only my problem or is it a bug (of CB or GDB itself)? I use DBG 6.3 donwnloaded from MinGW site.Make sure you have "generate debugging symbols" enabled and you do not have "strip executable" turned on.
All project settings are OK. It doesn't work even for fresh projects generated by the app wizard. The same project on a different PC (32-bit WinXP SP2) works fine.