Author Topic: The 04 September 2010 build (6570) is out.  (Read 33934 times)

Offline killerbot

  • Administrator
  • Lives here!
  • *****
  • Posts: 5490
The 04 September 2010 build (6570) is out.
« on: September 04, 2010, 10:48:10 pm »
Get quick announcements through the RSS feed http://www.codeblocks.org/nightly/CodeBlock_RSS.xml

Before you use a nightly make sure you understand how it works.

A link to the unicode windows wxWidget dll for Code::Blocks : http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/wxmsw28u_gcc_cb_wx2810_gcc441.7z

For those who might need this one (when no MingW installed on your system) : the mingw10m.dll : http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/mingwm10_gcc441.7z

The 04 September 2010 build is out.
  - Windows :
   http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/CB_20100904_rev6570_win32.7z
  - Linux :
   none

Resolved Fixed:


Regressions/Confirmed/Annoying/Common bugs:



    Offline seb_seb0

    • Almost regular
    • **
    • Posts: 166
    Re: The 04 September 2010 build (6570) is out.
    « Reply #1 on: September 05, 2010, 03:05:08 pm »
    Hello,

    unfortunately, the wxSmith bug is not solved (colours & font editors in wxPropertyGrid not displaying image).

    I have however found a fix for the wxsMyColourPropertyClass.
    The problem come from a change in name of a virtual method :
       from virtual
    Code
    wxSize GetImageSize() const;
       to
    Code
    virtual wxSize OnMeasureImage(int item = -1)  const;

    I have created a new method OnMeasureImage, and now it works !
    See patch attached.

    Hopefully it will always be that simple for all others regressions in wxSmith.

    Regards,

    Sebastien

    PS: it is written in the wxWidgets doc:

    Quote
    virtual void wxPGProperty::OnCustomPaint  ( wxDC &  dc, 
      const wxRect &  rect, 
      wxPGPaintData &  paintdata   
     )   [virtual]

    Override to paint an image in front of the property value text or drop-down list item (but only if wxPGProperty::OnMeasureImage is overridden as well).

    Offline ahui886

    • Multiple posting newcomer
    • *
    • Posts: 29
    Re: The 04 September 2010 build (6570) is out.
    « Reply #2 on: September 06, 2010, 03:05:40 am »
    Thanks!
    code:blocks is becoming better and better.

    Offline eckard_klotz

    • Almost regular
    • **
    • Posts: 194
    Re: The 04 September 2010 build (6570) is out.
    « Reply #3 on: September 09, 2010, 12:58:54 pm »
    Hello Everybody.

    I'm a user of the cppcheck-plugin. The tool itself works. But I'm missing a posibility to configure it.

    1. Since I don't have the admin-rights to install cppcheck I've copied a ready installed package from an other computer to my system. It works, but I have to search the tool every-time when i want to start it. Ii there a possibility to set the location in the environment-configuration of code::blocks?

    2. If I load the code::blocks project of cppcheck and start cppcheck to testst its own sources I can click on one message,  code::blocks opens the file and jumps to the asosiated code-line. If I do the same in my project, I have to search the code-line by my self. How do I have to configure my project to activate the 'find by' click feature?

    3. I want to suppress some messages. I can see that cppcheck will be started with an file named 'CppCheckInput.txt'. I think that this file can be used for configuring the tool. But where is it? Or How can I tell code::blocks to use my own one?

    Best Regards,
                       Eckard Klotz.

    Offline oBFusCATed

    • Developer
    • Lives here!
    • *****
    • Posts: 13413
      • Travis build status
    Re: The 04 September 2010 build (6570) is out.
    « Reply #4 on: September 09, 2010, 02:01:05 pm »

    3. I want to suppress some messages. I can see that cppcheck will be started with an file named 'CppCheckInput.txt'. I think that this file can be used for configuring the tool. But where is it? Or How can I tell code::blocks to use my own one?
    This file is auto generated and it is used to specify which files should be checked. I think it can't be used for error suppression...
    (most of the time I ignore long posts)
    [strangers don't send me private messages, I'll ignore them; post a topic in the forum, but first read the rules!]

    Offline killerbot

    • Administrator
    • Lives here!
    • *****
    • Posts: 5490
    Re: The 04 September 2010 build (6570) is out.
    « Reply #5 on: September 09, 2010, 02:02:08 pm »
    cppcheck plug-in currently is not configurable, but it would be good idea (it already crossed our mind) to configure the path for it so it can find the cppcheck executable.

    That input file is generated on the fly, for providing the input files, it is not reusable.

    Offline MortenMacFly

    • Administrator
    • Lives here!
    • *****
    • Posts: 9694
    Re: The 04 September 2010 build (6570) is out.
    « Reply #6 on: September 09, 2010, 02:08:22 pm »
    1. Since I don't have the admin-rights to install cppcheck I've copied a ready installed package from an other computer to my system. It works, but I have to search the tool every-time when i want to start it. Ii there a possibility to set the location in the environment-configuration of code::blocks?
    This you can actually solve if you put the executable to your path or in the path where codeblocks.exe is located. Alternatively expand the PATH environment variable to the path where your cppcheck.exe is.

    However, surely the plugin could be enhanced to offer at least some configuration options.
    Compiler logging: Settings->Compiler & Debugger->tab "Other"->Compiler logging="Full command line"
    C::B Manual: https://www.codeblocks.org/docs/main_codeblocks_en.html
    C::B FAQ: https://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=FAQ

    Offline eckard_klotz

    • Almost regular
    • **
    • Posts: 194
    Re: The 04 September 2010 build (6570) is out.
    « Reply #7 on: September 09, 2010, 06:41:15 pm »
    Hello Everybody.

    Thanks for the quick reaction. I learned the plug-in is still under development and there is somebody who is interested in ideas to define new features. That's great.

    Has anybody an idea why the cppcheck-project is able to activate the 'find by click' feature I described (and why my project is not)?

    Quote
    2. If I load the code::blocks project of cppcheck and start cppcheck to testst its own sources I can click on one message,  code::blocks opens the file and jumps to the asosiated code-line. If I do the same in my project, I have to search the code-line by my self. How do I have to configure my project to activate the 'find by' click feature?

    Best regards,
                       Eckard Klotz.

    Offline MortenMacFly

    • Administrator
    • Lives here!
    • *****
    • Posts: 9694
    Re: The 04 September 2010 build (6570) is out.
    « Reply #8 on: September 09, 2010, 07:42:56 pm »
    Has anybody an idea why the cppcheck-project is able to activate the 'find by click' feature I described (and why my project is not)?
    No, this works for me. Can you send a stripped sample project where it does not? Is it probably Makefile based (although this still should work)?!
    Compiler logging: Settings->Compiler & Debugger->tab "Other"->Compiler logging="Full command line"
    C::B Manual: https://www.codeblocks.org/docs/main_codeblocks_en.html
    C::B FAQ: https://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=FAQ

    Offline emptymind

    • Single posting newcomer
    • *
    • Posts: 5
    Re: The 04 September 2010 build (6570) is out.
    « Reply #9 on: September 10, 2010, 12:47:13 pm »
    When i use abbreviation, new line symbols '\n' just printing in editor. It was working fine before.

    Offline ChaiAo

    • Multiple posting newcomer
    • *
    • Posts: 13
    Re: The 04 September 2010 build (6570) is out.
    « Reply #10 on: September 10, 2010, 03:34:44 pm »
    Excuse me, but I have question.

    What's the different between "build (6570)" and "build (6570) DEBUGGER BRANCH version" please?
    I have downloaded "Code::Blocks 10.05" which displayed on index.
    Please tell me which patch should I have?
    "build (6570)" or "build (6570) DEBUGGER BRANCH version"

    Thanks a lot.

    Offline MortenMacFly

    • Administrator
    • Lives here!
    • *****
    • Posts: 9694
    Re: The 04 September 2010 build (6570) is out.
    « Reply #11 on: September 10, 2010, 04:22:27 pm »
    What's the different between "build (6570)" and "build (6570) DEBUGGER BRANCH version" please?
    http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,13170.msg88486.html#msg88486
    ....read the last sentences.
    Compiler logging: Settings->Compiler & Debugger->tab "Other"->Compiler logging="Full command line"
    C::B Manual: https://www.codeblocks.org/docs/main_codeblocks_en.html
    C::B FAQ: https://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=FAQ

    Offline ChaiAo

    • Multiple posting newcomer
    • *
    • Posts: 13
    Re: The 04 September 2010 build (6570) is out.
    « Reply #12 on: September 11, 2010, 03:13:59 pm »
    What's the different between "build (6570)" and "build (6570) DEBUGGER BRANCH version" please?
    http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,13170.msg88486.html#msg88486
    ....read the last sentences.

    Thanks a lot.
    But why doesn't Mr. killerbot put them together?

    Offline ptDev

    • Almost regular
    • **
    • Posts: 222
    Re: The 04 September 2010 build (6570) is out.
    « Reply #13 on: September 11, 2010, 04:09:43 pm »
    What's the different between "build (6570)" and "build (6570) DEBUGGER BRANCH version" please?
    http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,13170.msg88486.html#msg88486
    ....read the last sentences.

    Thanks a lot.
    But why doesn't Mr. killerbot put them together?

    The debugger branch will be merged with the trunk as soon as it becomes stable. The "Debugger Branch" releases are meant precisely for testing towards this end.

    Offline ChaiAo

    • Multiple posting newcomer
    • *
    • Posts: 13
    Re: The 04 September 2010 build (6570) is out.
    « Reply #14 on: September 12, 2010, 01:13:51 am »
    OK. Thank you!
     :)