|
killerbot
|
 |
« on: May 17, 2009, 10:23:03 am » |
|
Get quick announcements through the RSS feed http://www.codeblocks.org/nightly/CodeBlock_RSS.xmlBefore you use a nightly make sure you understand how it works. A link to the unicode windows wxWidget dll for Code::Blocks : http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/wxmsw28u_gcc_cb_wx2810.7zFor those who might need this one (when no MingW installed on your system) : the mingw10m.dll : http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/mingwm10_gcc421.7zThe 16 May 2009 build is out. - Windows : http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/CB_20090516_rev5602_win32.7z - Linux : none Resolved Fixed: - Applied: [Patch #2730] miss armelfgcc in the common_functions.script (in modified form)
- Fixed: [Bug #14969] profiler/cbprofilerexec.cpp:255: Array index out of bounds
- added debian-subdir to main Makefile.am (for make dist)
- Fixed: [Bug #14424] It is not possible to create .pdb file in Release version.
- wx-2.9 migration: wxFNB patch to use new event handling system.
- Added GetCBConfigDir() to call routines that check for APPDATA var
- CodeSnippets 1 3.98 2009/04/26
When passing URL, remove anything pass \r or \n
Fixed: A dragged URL item to a snippet did not save. CS did not know it had changed.
Added zoom functions to Apps DragScroll class
Added GetCBConfigDir() to call routines that check for user APPDATA var - Many wx-2.9 migration Fixes
- cbBrowseTrackr 1.2.76 2009/04/28
- Add include ConfigManager for linux - CodeSnppets 1 3.99 2009/04/29
- App: check for standalone execution before closing in OnClose() to avoid error "can't delete default.conf.cbTemp" - avoid division by zero, in wxSmith on macosx
- added libtool and automake to build-dependencies for debian/ubuntu
- added subversion and xsltproc to build-dependencies for debian/ubuntu; run bootstrap in debian-buildprocess, if needed; automatically update ChangeLog to HEAD in debian-buildprocess by running updateChangeLog.sh
- added subversion and xsltproc to build-dependencies for debian/ubuntu; run bootstrap in debian-buildprocess, if needed; automatically update ChangeLog to HEAD in debian-buildprocess by running updateChangeLog.sh
- C++Ox for gcc option
- debugger: send debugger events and react accordingly (applied patch #2632)
- change some debian files to be more compliant to uptodate standards
- fix a possible compiler-warning
Regressions/Confirmed/Annoying/Common bugs: |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BCCISProf
Advanced newcomer
Posts: 57
|
|
« Reply #1 on: May 17, 2009, 12:52:10 pm » |
|
How did the files in this release get a timestamp of 10/16/09?
Although the splash screen has the correct date, under help it lists the Build as April 3, 2009?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
killerbot
|
|
« Reply #2 on: May 17, 2009, 01:10:32 pm » |
|
I have no clue at all .... maybe I screwed something up ....
Will check.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pasgui
Almost regular
Posts: 159
|
|
« Reply #3 on: May 17, 2009, 02:11:26 pm » |
|
Build for Ubuntu i386 can be found hereThe size of the codeblocks-dbg package is about 45MB instead of 12MB previously. Best regards, pasgui |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
killerbot
|
|
« Reply #4 on: May 17, 2009, 02:22:53 pm » |
|
the timestamps of October : apparently the clock of my virtual box is on October already. Corrected it  The about box, not sure why (yet). |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ollydbg
|
|
« Reply #5 on: May 17, 2009, 03:47:23 pm » |
|
How did the files in this release get a timestamp of 10/16/09?
Although the splash screen has the correct date, under help it lists the Build as April 3, 2009?
Yes, I downloaded this package and found the wrong date either.  To killerbot: Thanks for the new release. But I feel a little disappointed because several code completion patches were still not included.  Though someone said that the good things were never be lost...... Maybe, they were still be testing. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Note: I'm not the author of Ollydbg debugger! Never ask question about that.
|
|
|
|
MortenMacFly
|
|
« Reply #6 on: May 18, 2009, 08:35:45 am » |
|
Though someone said that the good things were never be lost...... Maybe, they were still be testing. Why should I lie? It's is like I said. All is covered will still test internally. I even proposed a schedule how we want to apply them. Don't you worry? Next time you are in worries please just read this post of mine.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ollydbg
|
|
« Reply #7 on: May 18, 2009, 09:58:15 am » |
|
Though someone said that the good things were never be lost...... Maybe, they were still be testing. Why should I lie? It's is like I said. All is covered will still test internally. I even proposed a schedule how we want to apply them. Don't you worry? Next time you are in worries please just read this post of mine. Thanks Morten. I'm getting a little worried, but after reading your post, it's gone. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Note: I'm not the author of Ollydbg debugger! Never ask question about that.
|
|
|
|
jens
|
|
« Reply #8 on: May 18, 2009, 11:18:02 am » |
|
The size of the codeblocks-dbg package is about 45MB instead of 12MB previously.
This happened due to changes in compatibility level from deprecated 4 to 5. dh_strip changed behaviour, sorry. Fixed in svn r5607, I added a contrib-plugins-dbg package and added the debug-version of the codeblocks shared library, that missed in former versions. Finally I mentioned to upload r5607 of the debian nightlies to my server (see signature). They are build on lenny-pbuilder and are linked against wxWidgets 2.8. 10 from now on. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
coolskyboy
Newcomer
Posts: 1
|
|
« Reply #9 on: May 19, 2009, 04:50:15 am » |
|
I could not download ......only a html file...
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: May 19, 2009, 04:51:52 am by coolskyboy »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
jens
|
|
« Reply #10 on: May 19, 2009, 06:49:37 am » |
|
I could not download ......only a html file...
If you mean the links provided by killerbot in the starting post: click the link you want and on the following site, you get two (really) download links. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
critic
Advanced newcomer
Posts: 74
|
|
« Reply #11 on: May 19, 2009, 11:12:21 am » |
|
Hello!  How can I request to revert access to project settings pages in C::B when using custom makefile?As you may remember, I use in my plugin C::B project's settings to generate makefile, that is used by make. I found that it is allowed to change project settings when using custom makefile in the eclipse IDE  But eclipse is not comfortable IDE for me  and I want use only C::B (but this limit makes use of it complex) Will wait answer...  With best regards, critic! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
jens
|
|
« Reply #12 on: May 19, 2009, 11:22:39 am » |
|
Hello! How can I request to revert access to project settings pages in C::B when using custom makefile?As you may remember, I use in my plugin C::B project's settings to generate makefile, that is used by make. I found that it is allowed to change project settings when using custom makefile in the eclipse IDE But eclipse is not comfortable IDE for me and I want use only C::B (but this limit makes use of it complex) Will wait answer... With best regards, critic! It does not m ake sense in my eyes. Project settings are normally not used for custom makefiles, because settings are done via the makefile. If you need special settings for your plugin, you should create an own dialog for that purpose. It's not too difficult I think. Making the project settings accessible, would make other users believe, that they can change anything via this settings, even if the settings are ignored. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
critic
Advanced newcomer
Posts: 74
|
|
« Reply #13 on: May 19, 2009, 11:29:29 am » |
|
OK! I'll try do that. Thanks for fast answer. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pingf
Advanced newcomer
Posts: 12
|
|
« Reply #14 on: May 20, 2009, 04:23:35 am » |
|
Build for Ubuntu i386 can be found hereThe size of the codeblocks-dbg package is about 45MB instead of 12MB previously. Best regards, pasgui do you have the deb for ubuntu jaunty? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
