Author Topic: The 16 May 2009 build (5602) is out.  (Read 73047 times)

Offline killerbot

  • Administrator
  • Lives here!
  • *****
  • Posts: 5490
The 16 May 2009 build (5602) is out.
« on: May 17, 2009, 10:23:03 am »
Get quick announcements through the RSS feed http://www.codeblocks.org/nightly/CodeBlock_RSS.xml

Before you use a nightly make sure you understand how it works.

A link to the unicode windows wxWidget dll for Code::Blocks : http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/wxmsw28u_gcc_cb_wx2810.7z

For those who might need this one (when no MingW installed on your system) : the mingw10m.dll : http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/mingwm10_gcc421.7z

The 16 May 2009 build is out.
  - Windows :
   http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/CB_20090516_rev5602_win32.7z
  - Linux :
   none

Resolved Fixed:

  • Applied: [Patch #2730] miss armelfgcc in the common_functions.script (in modified form)
  • Fixed: [Bug #14969] profiler/cbprofilerexec.cpp:255: Array index out of bounds
  • added debian-subdir to main Makefile.am (for make dist)
  • Fixed: [Bug #14424] It is not possible to create .pdb file in Release version.
  • wx-2.9 migration: wxFNB patch to use new event handling system.
  • Added GetCBConfigDir() to call routines that check for APPDATA var
  • CodeSnippets 1 3.98 2009/04/26
    When passing URL, remove anything pass \r or \n
    Fixed: A dragged URL item to a snippet did not save. CS did not know it had changed.
    Added zoom functions to Apps DragScroll class
    Added GetCBConfigDir() to call routines that check for user APPDATA var
  • Many wx-2.9 migration     Fixes
  • cbBrowseTrackr 1.2.76 2009/04/28
    - Add include ConfigManager for linux
  • CodeSnppets 1 3.99 2009/04/29
    - App: check for standalone execution before closing in OnClose() to avoid error "can't delete default.conf.cbTemp"
  • avoid division by zero, in wxSmith on macosx
  • added libtool and automake to build-dependencies for debian/ubuntu
  • added subversion and xsltproc to build-dependencies for debian/ubuntu; run bootstrap in debian-buildprocess, if needed; automatically update ChangeLog to HEAD in debian-buildprocess by running updateChangeLog.sh
  • added subversion and xsltproc to build-dependencies for debian/ubuntu; run bootstrap in debian-buildprocess, if needed; automatically update ChangeLog to HEAD in debian-buildprocess by running updateChangeLog.sh
  • C++Ox for gcc option
  • debugger: send debugger events and react accordingly (applied patch #2632)
  • change some debian files to be more compliant to uptodate standards
  • fix a possible compiler-warning

Regressions/Confirmed/Annoying/Common bugs:



    Offline BCCISProf

    • Multiple posting newcomer
    • *
    • Posts: 60
      • Professor Langsam's Home Page
    Re: The 16 May 2009 build (5602) is out.
    « Reply #1 on: May 17, 2009, 12:52:10 pm »
    How did the files in this release get a timestamp of 10/16/09?

    Although the splash screen has the correct date, under help it lists the Build as April 3, 2009?

    Offline killerbot

    • Administrator
    • Lives here!
    • *****
    • Posts: 5490
    Re: The 16 May 2009 build (5602) is out.
    « Reply #2 on: May 17, 2009, 01:10:32 pm »
    I have no clue at all .... maybe I screwed something up ....
    Will check.

    Offline pasgui

    • Almost regular
    • **
    • Posts: 165
      • LGP
    Re: The 16 May 2009 build (5602) is out.
    « Reply #3 on: May 17, 2009, 02:11:26 pm »
    Build for Ubuntu i386 can be found here

    The size of the codeblocks-dbg package is about 45MB instead of 12MB previously.

    Best regards, pasgui

    Offline killerbot

    • Administrator
    • Lives here!
    • *****
    • Posts: 5490
    Re: The 16 May 2009 build (5602) is out.
    « Reply #4 on: May 17, 2009, 02:22:53 pm »
    the timestamps of October : apparently the clock of my virtual box is on October already. Corrected it :-)

    The about box, not sure why (yet).

    Offline ollydbg

    • Developer
    • Lives here!
    • *****
    • Posts: 5910
    • OpenCV and Robotics
      • Chinese OpenCV forum moderator
    Re: The 16 May 2009 build (5602) is out.
    « Reply #5 on: May 17, 2009, 03:47:23 pm »
    How did the files in this release get a timestamp of 10/16/09?

    Although the splash screen has the correct date, under help it lists the Build as April 3, 2009?

    Yes, I downloaded this package and found the wrong date either. :D

    To killerbot:
    Thanks for the new release.
    But I feel a little disappointed because several code completion patches were still not included. :(
    Though someone said that the good things were never be lost......
    Maybe, they were still be testing. :D
    If some piece of memory should be reused, turn them to variables (or const variables).
    If some piece of operations should be reused, turn them to functions.
    If they happened together, then turn them to classes.

    Offline MortenMacFly

    • Administrator
    • Lives here!
    • *****
    • Posts: 9694
    Re: The 16 May 2009 build (5602) is out.
    « Reply #6 on: May 18, 2009, 08:35:45 am »
    Though someone said that the good things were never be lost......
    Maybe, they were still be testing. :D
    Why should I lie? It's is like I said. All is covered will still test internally. I even proposed a schedule how we want to apply them. Don't you worry? Next time you are in worries please just read this post of mine. ;-)
    Compiler logging: Settings->Compiler & Debugger->tab "Other"->Compiler logging="Full command line"
    C::B Manual: https://www.codeblocks.org/docs/main_codeblocks_en.html
    C::B FAQ: https://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=FAQ

    Offline ollydbg

    • Developer
    • Lives here!
    • *****
    • Posts: 5910
    • OpenCV and Robotics
      • Chinese OpenCV forum moderator
    Re: The 16 May 2009 build (5602) is out.
    « Reply #7 on: May 18, 2009, 09:58:15 am »
    Though someone said that the good things were never be lost......
    Maybe, they were still be testing. :D
    Why should I lie? It's is like I said. All is covered will still test internally. I even proposed a schedule how we want to apply them. Don't you worry? Next time you are in worries please just read this post of mine. ;-)

    Thanks Morten.
    I'm getting a little worried, but after reading your post, it's gone. :D
    If some piece of memory should be reused, turn them to variables (or const variables).
    If some piece of operations should be reused, turn them to functions.
    If they happened together, then turn them to classes.

    Offline Jenna

    • Administrator
    • Lives here!
    • *****
    • Posts: 7255
    Re: The 16 May 2009 build (5602) is out.
    « Reply #8 on: May 18, 2009, 11:18:02 am »
    The size of the codeblocks-dbg package is about 45MB instead of 12MB previously.

    This happened due to changes in compatibility level from deprecated 4 to 5.
    dh_strip changed behaviour, sorry.

    Fixed in svn r5607, I added a contrib-plugins-dbg package and added the debug-version of the codeblocks shared library, that missed in former versions.

    Finally I mentioned to upload r5607 of the debian nightlies to my server (see signature).

    They are build on lenny-pbuilder and are linked against wxWidgets 2.8.10 from now on.

    coolskyboy

    • Guest
    Re: The 16 May 2009 build (5602) is out.
    « Reply #9 on: May 19, 2009, 04:50:15 am »
    I could not download ......only a html file...
    « Last Edit: May 19, 2009, 04:51:52 am by coolskyboy »

    Offline Jenna

    • Administrator
    • Lives here!
    • *****
    • Posts: 7255
    Re: The 16 May 2009 build (5602) is out.
    « Reply #10 on: May 19, 2009, 06:49:37 am »
    I could not download ......only a html file...
    If you mean the links provided by killerbot in the starting post:
    click the link you want and on the following site, you get two (really) download links.

    Offline critic

    • Multiple posting newcomer
    • *
    • Posts: 93
    Re: The 16 May 2009 build (5602) is out.
    « Reply #11 on: May 19, 2009, 11:12:21 am »
    Hello! :P

    How can I request to revert access to project settings pages in C::B when using custom makefile?

    As you may remember, I use in my plugin C::B project's settings to generate makefile, that is used by make.

    I found that it is allowed to change project settings when using custom makefile in the eclipse IDE  8)
    But eclipse is not comfortable IDE for me :? and I want use only C::B (but this limit makes use of it complex)

    Will wait answer... :shock:
    With best regards, critic!

    Offline Jenna

    • Administrator
    • Lives here!
    • *****
    • Posts: 7255
    Re: The 16 May 2009 build (5602) is out.
    « Reply #12 on: May 19, 2009, 11:22:39 am »
    Hello! :P

    How can I request to revert access to project settings pages in C::B when using custom makefile?

    As you may remember, I use in my plugin C::B project's settings to generate makefile, that is used by make.

    I found that it is allowed to change project settings when using custom makefile in the eclipse IDE  8)
    But eclipse is not comfortable IDE for me :? and I want use only C::B (but this limit makes use of it complex)

    Will wait answer... :shock:
    With best regards, critic!
    It does not m ake sense in my eyes.
    Project settings are normally not used for custom makefiles, because settings are done via the makefile.
    If you need special settings for your plugin, you should create an own dialog for that purpose. It's not too difficult I think.

    Making the project settings accessible, would make other users believe, that they can change anything via this settings, even if the settings are ignored.

    Offline critic

    • Multiple posting newcomer
    • *
    • Posts: 93
    Re: The 16 May 2009 build (5602) is out.
    « Reply #13 on: May 19, 2009, 11:29:29 am »
    OK! I'll try do that. Thanks for fast answer. :)

    Offline pingf

    • Multiple posting newcomer
    • *
    • Posts: 12
    Re: The 16 May 2009 build (5602) is out.
    « Reply #14 on: May 20, 2009, 04:23:35 am »
    Build for Ubuntu i386 can be found here

    The size of the codeblocks-dbg package is about 45MB instead of 12MB previously.

    Best regards, pasgui
    do you have the deb for ubuntu jaunty?